Standings Individuals Scoreboard Team Detail Individual Detail Round Report

2016 ACF Regionals at UChicago - Preliminary Individual Detail

Alston Boyd (DII), Chicago A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago F (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
2 Northwestern MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Chicago C (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
4 Chicago G (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
5 Michigan State A (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 0.00 55
6 Illinois B (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
8 Michigan A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 WUSTL B (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
Total 8.0 22 3 160 1.28 0.00 205

Athena Kern (DII), Chicago A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago F (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
2 Northwestern MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
3 Chicago C (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
4 Chicago G (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
5 Michigan State A (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
6 Illinois B (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
8 Michigan A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
9 WUSTL B (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
Total 8.0 24 4 160 1.38 0.00 220

James Lasker, Chicago A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago F (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 0.00 30
2 Northwestern MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
3 Chicago C (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
4 Chicago G (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Michigan State A (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
6 Illinois B (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
8 Michigan A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 WUSTL B (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
Total 8.0 24 5 160 1.34 0.00 215

Kai Smith (DII), Chicago A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago F (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 20
2 Northwestern MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
3 Chicago C (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Chicago G (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
5 Michigan State A (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
6 Illinois B (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
8 Michigan A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 WUSTL B (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
Total 8.0 29 6 160 1.62 0.00 260

Jason Zhou (DII), Chicago B

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan B (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
2 Illinois A (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
3 Northern Illinois (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
4 Notre Dame (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
5 Chicago D (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Michigan State B (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
8 Chicago E (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
9 WUSTL A Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
Total 8.0 26 6 160 1.44 0.00 230

Marianna Zhang (DII), Chicago B

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan B (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
2 Illinois A (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
3 Northern Illinois (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
4 Notre Dame (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Chicago D (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
7 Michigan State B (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
8 Chicago E (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
9 WUSTL A Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
Total 8.0 29 3 160 1.72 0.00 275

Samir Khan (DII), Chicago B

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan B (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
2 Illinois A (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
3 Northern Illinois (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Notre Dame (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
5 Chicago D (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
7 Michigan State B (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
8 Chicago E (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 WUSTL A Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 16 5 160 0.84 0.00 135

Tamara Vardomskaya, Chicago B

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan B (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Illinois A (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
3 Northern Illinois (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
4 Notre Dame (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Chicago D (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
7 Michigan State B (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 Chicago E (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 WUSTL A Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 8.0 12 7 160 0.53 0.00 85

Adam Black (DII), Chicago C (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan State A (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
2 Illinois B (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
3 Chicago A UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
4 Michigan A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
5 WUSTL B (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
6 Chicago F (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Northwestern UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 Chicago G (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 12 4 160 0.62 0.00 100

Olivia Kiser (DII), Chicago C (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan State A (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
2 Illinois B (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
3 Chicago A UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Michigan A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
5 WUSTL B (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
6 Chicago F (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 0.00 65
7 Northwestern UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Chicago G (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
Total 8.0 21 1 160 1.28 0.00 205

Saieesh Rao (UG), Chicago C (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan State A (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
2 Illinois B (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Chicago A UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
4 Michigan A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
5 WUSTL B (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago F (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
7 Northwestern UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Chicago G (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
Total 8.0 19 6 160 1.00 0.00 160

Sam Winikow (DII), Chicago C (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan State A (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
2 Illinois B (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 7 0 20 3.50 0.00 70
3 Chicago A UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
4 Michigan A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
5 WUSTL B (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 0.00 85
6 Chicago F (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
7 Northwestern UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
9 Chicago G (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
Total 8.0 35 4 160 2.06 0.00 330

Annie Xu (DII), Chicago D (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Illinois A (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
2 Northern Illinois (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
3 Notre Dame (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Chicago B Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
6 Michigan State B (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
7 Chicago E (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
8 WUSTL A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Michigan B (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 14 1 160 0.84 0.00 135

Brett Barbin (DII), Chicago D (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Illinois A (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Northern Illinois (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
3 Notre Dame (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
5 Chicago B Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Michigan State B (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
7 Chicago E (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 WUSTL A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Michigan B (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 5 3 160 0.22 0.00 35

Francesco Scivittaro (DII), Chicago D (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Illinois A (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
2 Northern Illinois (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
3 Notre Dame (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Chicago B Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Michigan State B (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
7 Chicago E (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
8 WUSTL A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
9 Michigan B (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
Total 8.0 19 4 160 1.06 0.00 170

Jacob Manaker (DII), Chicago D (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Illinois A (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0
2 Northern Illinois (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
3 Notre Dame (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Chicago B Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
6 Michigan State B (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 0.00 65
7 Chicago E (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 20
8 WUSTL A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
9 Michigan B (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 0.00 25
Total 8.0 28 12 160 1.38 0.00 220

Aviv Hargil (DII), Chicago E (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
2 WUSTL A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Michigan B (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 Illinois A (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
5 Northern Illinois (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Notre Dame (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 Chicago D (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
8 Chicago B Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
9 Michigan State B (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
Total 8.0 5 3 160 0.22 0.00 35

Frimpong Baidoo (DII), Chicago E (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
2 WUSTL A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
3 Michigan B (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Illinois A (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
5 Northern Illinois (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
6 Notre Dame (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Chicago D (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
8 Chicago B Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Michigan State B (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
Total 8.0 14 4 160 0.75 0.00 120

R.J. Graham (DII), Chicago E (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
2 WUSTL A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Michigan B (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 0.00 10
4 Illinois A (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
5 Northern Illinois (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
6 Notre Dame (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Chicago D (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Chicago B Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 Michigan State B (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 8.0 11 6 160 0.50 0.00 80

Kevin Mi (DII), Chicago F (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago A Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Michigan A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
3 WUSTL B (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
5 Northwestern Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
6 Chicago C (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
7 Chicago G (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
8 Michigan State A (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
9 Illinois B (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 8.0 13 3 160 0.72 0.00 115

Sonya Wang (DII), Chicago F (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago A Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
2 Michigan A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 WUSTL B (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
5 Northwestern Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
6 Chicago C (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Chicago G (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
8 Michigan State A (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 Illinois B (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
Total 8.0 14 3 160 0.78 0.00 125

Calvin Chu (DII), Chicago G (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
2 Michigan State A (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Illinois B (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
4 Chicago A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Michigan A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
6 WUSTL B (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 Chicago F (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
8 Northwestern Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Chicago C (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 15 7 160 0.72 0.00 115

Federico Scivittaro (DII), Chicago G (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
2 Michigan State A (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Illinois B (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 Chicago A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
5 Michigan A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 WUSTL B (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
7 Chicago F (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
8 Northwestern Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
9 Chicago C (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0
Total 8.0 14 7 160 0.66 0.00 105

Alex Fregeau (UG), Illinois A (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago D (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
2 Chicago B MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Michigan State B (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
4 Chicago E (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
5 WUSTL A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Michigan B (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
8 Northern Illinois (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
9 Notre Dame (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
Total 8.0 24 4 160 1.38 0.00 220

Andrew Wang (UG), Illinois A (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago D (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 12 0 20 6.00 0.00 120
2 Chicago B MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 0.00 75
3 Michigan State B (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 10 2 20 4.50 0.00 90
4 Chicago E (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 0.00 85
5 WUSTL A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 0.00 65
6 Michigan B (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 10 0 20 5.00 0.00 100
8 Northern Illinois (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 11 2 20 5.00 0.00 100
9 Notre Dame (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 11 1 20 5.25 0.00 105
Total 8.0 78 8 160 4.62 0.00 740

Tyler Vaughan (UG), Illinois A (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago D (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
2 Chicago B MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Michigan State B (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 Chicago E (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 WUSTL A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
6 Michigan B (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Northern Illinois (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 Notre Dame (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
Total 8.0 5 0 160 0.31 0.00 50

Andy Sun (DII), Illinois B (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Northwestern Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Chicago C (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
3 Chicago G (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Michigan State A (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
6 Chicago A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Michigan A UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 WUSTL B (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
9 Chicago F (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
Total 8.0 16 1 160 0.97 0.00 155

Peter Miller (DII), Illinois B (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Northwestern Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Chicago C (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Chicago G (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Michigan State A (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Chicago A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Michigan A UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 WUSTL B (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
9 Chicago F (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
Total 8.0 9 1 160 0.53 0.00 85

Steven Vo (DII), Illinois B (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Northwestern Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Chicago C (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
3 Chicago G (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 0.00 60
4 Michigan State A (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
6 Chicago A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
7 Michigan A UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
8 WUSTL B (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
9 Chicago F (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 0.00 65
Total 8.0 25 9 160 1.28 0.00 205

Zach Pease (DII), Illinois B (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Northwestern Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Chicago C (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Chicago G (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
4 Michigan State A (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Chicago A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 Michigan A UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 WUSTL B (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 Chicago F (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 8 0 160 0.50 0.00 80

Auroni Gupta, Michigan A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL B (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 0.00 80
2 Chicago F (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
3 Northwestern UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 0.00 60
4 Chicago C (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
5 Chicago G (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
6 Michigan State A (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 0.00 60
7 Illinois B (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 5 2 20 2.00 0.00 40
8 Chicago A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 0.00 55
Total 8.0 48 9 160 2.72 0.00 435

Brian McPeak, Michigan A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL B (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Chicago F (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
3 Northwestern UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
4 Chicago C (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
5 Chicago G (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Michigan State A (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
7 Illinois B (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
8 Chicago A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
Total 8.0 15 3 160 0.84 0.00 135

Sid Dogra (UG), Michigan A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL B (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
2 Chicago F (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
3 Northwestern UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
4 Chicago C (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
5 Chicago G (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0
6 Michigan State A (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
7 Illinois B (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
8 Chicago A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
Total 8.0 18 6 160 0.94 0.00 150

Will Nediger, Michigan A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL B (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 6 2 20 2.50 0.00 50
2 Chicago F (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
3 Northwestern UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
4 Chicago C (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 0.00 80
5 Chicago G (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 0.00 70
6 Michigan State A (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
7 Illinois B (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
8 Chicago A Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
Total 8.0 42 5 160 2.47 0.00 395

Efosa Idusuyi (DII), Michigan B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago B Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
2 Michigan State B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 2 3 20 0.25 0.00 5
3 Chicago E (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
6 Illinois A (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 Northern Illinois (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
8 Notre Dame (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
Total 6.0 13 3 120 0.96 0.00 115

Kenji Golimlim (UG), Michigan B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago B Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 0.00 70
2 Michigan State B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 0.00 80
3 Chicago E (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 5 2 20 2.00 0.00 40
4 WUSTL A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
6 Illinois A (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
7 Northern Illinois (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 12 1 20 5.75 0.00 115
8 Notre Dame (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
9 Chicago D (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 7 0 20 3.50 0.00 70
Total 8.0 51 7 160 2.97 0.00 475

Paul Hamilton (UG), Michigan B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
2 Michigan State B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 WUSTL A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
6 Illinois A (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
8 Notre Dame (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Chicago D (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 5.0 2 2 100 0.10 0.00 10

Priya S. (DII), Michigan B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago B Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Chicago E (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 WUSTL A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 Northern Illinois (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Chicago D (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 5.0 1 0 100 0.10 0.00 10

Todd Maslyk (UG), Michigan B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago B Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
2 Michigan State B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
3 Chicago E (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 5 2 20 2.00 0.00 40
4 WUSTL A Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
6 Illinois A (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
7 Northern Illinois (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
8 Notre Dame (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 5 3 20 1.75 0.00 35
9 Chicago D (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
Total 8.0 22 9 160 1.09 0.00 175

Austin Foos (DII), Michigan State A (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago C (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
2 Chicago G (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 0.00 30
4 Illinois B (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
5 Chicago A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Michigan A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 WUSTL B (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
8 Chicago F (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
9 Northwestern Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
Total 8.0 22 8 160 1.12 0.00 180

Dillon Edwards (UG), Michigan State A (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago C (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
2 Chicago G (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 0.00 90
4 Illinois B (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
5 Chicago A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
6 Michigan A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
7 WUSTL B (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 0.00 80
8 Chicago F (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
9 Northwestern Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
Total 8.0 37 1 160 2.28 0.00 365

Harris Bunker (DII), Michigan State A (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago C (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
2 Chicago G (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
4 Illinois B (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
5 Chicago A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
6 Michigan A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 WUSTL B (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 Chicago F (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Northwestern Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
Total 8.0 7 2 160 0.38 0.00 60

Lucas Weingartz (UG), Michigan State A (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Chicago C (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
2 Chicago G (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 Illinois B (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Chicago A Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Michigan A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
7 WUSTL B (DII) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 Chicago F (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
9 Northwestern Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
Total 8.0 8 6 160 0.31 0.00 50

Brian Hanley (UG), Michigan State B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL A Oxford A + Maryland C 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
2 Michigan B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Illinois A (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
4 Northern Illinois (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
5 Notre Dame (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
6 Chicago D (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
9 Chicago E (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 5.0 5 0 100 0.50 0.00 50

Micah Norwood (UG), Michigan State B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL A Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
2 Michigan B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
3 Illinois A (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
4 Northern Illinois (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
5 Notre Dame (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
6 Chicago D (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Chicago B UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Chicago E (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 0.5 2 0 10 2.00 0.00 20
Total 6.0 7 0 120 0.58 0.00 70

Samantha Perry (DII), Michigan State B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL A Oxford A + Maryland C 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
2 Michigan B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Illinois A (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
4 Northern Illinois (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
5 Notre Dame (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Chicago D (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
9 Chicago E (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 5.0 2 0 100 0.20 0.00 20

Sarah DeFrancesco (DII), Michigan State B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL A Oxford A + Maryland C 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
2 Michigan B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
3 Illinois A (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Northern Illinois (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 0.5 2 0 10 2.00 0.00 20
5 Notre Dame (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
6 Chicago D (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 0.5 1 1 10 0.50 0.00 5
7 Chicago B UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Chicago E (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 0.5 1 0 10 1.00 0.00 10
Total 5.0 6 1 100 0.55 0.00 55

Sarah Wrase (DII), Michigan State B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL A Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
2 Michigan B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
3 Illinois A (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
4 Northern Illinois (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Notre Dame (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
6 Chicago D (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 0.5 2 1 10 1.50 0.00 15
7 Chicago B UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Chicago E (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 0.5 0 1 10 -0.50 0.00 -5
Total 5.5 4 2 110 0.27 0.00 30

Trent Koch (DII), Michigan State B (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 WUSTL A Oxford A + Maryland C 0.5 0 0 10 0.00 0.00 0
2 Michigan B (UG) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 0.5 1 0 10 1.00 0.00 10
3 Illinois A (UG) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
4 Northern Illinois (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 0.5 2 0 10 2.00 0.00 20
5 Notre Dame (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 0.5 1 0 10 1.00 0.00 10
6 Chicago D (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 Chicago B UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Chicago E (DII) Michigan A + Georgetown 0.5 3 1 10 2.50 0.00 25
Total 5.5 12 1 110 1.05 0.00 115

Alec Krueger (UG), Northern Illinois (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Notre Dame (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
2 Chicago D (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
3 Chicago B UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Michigan State B (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
5 Chicago E (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
6 WUSTL A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
7 Michigan B (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
8 Illinois A (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 28 2 160 1.69 0.00 270

Brandon Nakashima (DII), Northern Illinois (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Notre Dame (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
2 Chicago D (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Chicago B UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
4 Michigan State B (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Chicago E (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 WUSTL A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Michigan B (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Illinois A (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
Total 8.0 10 1 160 0.59 0.00 95

Kevin McNeeley (DII), Northern Illinois (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Notre Dame (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Chicago D (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Chicago B UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 Michigan State B (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
5 Chicago E (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
6 WUSTL A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 Michigan B (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 Illinois A (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
Total 8.0 3 1 160 0.16 0.00 25

Zohra Sattar (DII), Northern Illinois (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Notre Dame (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
2 Chicago D (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Chicago B UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
4 Michigan State B (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
5 Chicago E (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
6 WUSTL A Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Michigan B (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 Illinois A (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 6 2 160 0.31 0.00 50

Dipayan Banerjee (DII), Northwestern

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Illinois B (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
2 Chicago A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Michigan A UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 WUSTL B (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
5 Chicago F (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 Chicago C (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
8 Chicago G (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Michigan State A (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
Total 8.0 1 0 160 0.06 0.00 10

Dylan Minarik (UG), Northwestern

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Illinois B (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 0.00 70
2 Chicago A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 0.00 55
3 Michigan A UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
4 WUSTL B (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 9 3 20 3.75 0.00 75
5 Chicago F (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 5 3 20 1.75 0.00 35
7 Chicago C (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 45
8 Chicago G (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 12 2 20 5.50 0.00 110
9 Michigan State A (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 0.00 70
Total 8.0 58 14 160 3.19 0.00 510

Greg Peterson, Northwestern

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Illinois B (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
2 Chicago A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 25
3 Michigan A UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
4 WUSTL B (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
5 Chicago F (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 0.00 80
7 Chicago C (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
8 Chicago G (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
9 Michigan State A (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
Total 8.0 40 1 160 2.47 0.00 395

Max Rong (UG), Northwestern

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Illinois B (DII) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
2 Chicago A MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Michigan A UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 WUSTL B (DII) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
5 Chicago F (DII) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
7 Chicago C (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Chicago G (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Michigan State A (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
Total 8.0 6 1 160 0.34 0.00 55

Alaina Anderson (DII), Notre Dame (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
9 Illinois A (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
Total 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5

Andrew Kiss (UG), Notre Dame (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Northern Illinois (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
3 Chicago D (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
4 Chicago B Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
5 Michigan State B (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
6 Chicago E (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
7 WUSTL A UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Michigan B (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
Total 7.0 22 3 140 1.46 0.00 205

John Roddy (DII), Notre Dame (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
9 Illinois A (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
Total 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15

Joseph Levano (DII), Notre Dame (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Northern Illinois (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
3 Chicago D (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
4 Chicago B Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
5 Michigan State B (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 0.00 30
6 Chicago E (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
7 WUSTL A UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
8 Michigan B (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 7.0 17 3 140 1.11 0.00 155

Kevin Yokum (DII), Notre Dame (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Northern Illinois (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Chicago D (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
4 Chicago B Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
5 Michigan State B (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
6 Chicago E (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
7 WUSTL A UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 5
8 Michigan B (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
9 Illinois A (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
Total 8.0 10 2 160 0.56 0.00 90

Patrick LeBlanc (DII), Notre Dame (UG)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Northern Illinois (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Chicago D (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
4 Chicago B Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
5 Michigan State B (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
6 Chicago E (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 0.00 55
7 WUSTL A UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Michigan B (UG) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
9 Illinois A (UG) Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
Total 8.0 24 4 160 1.38 0.00 220

Charles Hang, WUSTL A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan State B (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 7 0 20 3.50 0.00 70
2 Chicago E (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 7 0 20 3.50 0.00 70
4 Michigan B (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
5 Illinois A (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 0.00 30
6 Northern Illinois (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 7 3 20 2.75 0.00 55
7 Notre Dame (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
8 Chicago D (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 6 2 20 2.50 0.00 50
9 Chicago B Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
Total 8.0 46 7 160 2.66 0.00 425

Richard Yu (UG), WUSTL A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan State B (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 10 2 20 4.50 0.00 90
2 Chicago E (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 0.00 75
4 Michigan B (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 10 3 20 4.25 0.00 85
5 Illinois A (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
6 Northern Illinois (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
7 Notre Dame (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 0.00 90
8 Chicago D (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 0.00 60
9 Chicago B Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 0.00 60
Total 8.0 62 8 160 3.62 0.00 580

Seth Ebner (UG), WUSTL A

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan State B (UG) Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
2 Chicago E (DII) MIT A + Johns Hopkins B 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 0.00 40
4 Michigan B (UG) Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
5 Illinois A (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
6 Northern Illinois (UG) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
7 Notre Dame (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Chicago D (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Chicago B Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
Total 8.0 12 2 160 0.69 0.00 110

Erik Tomasic (DII), WUSTL B (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan A Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Chicago F (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Northwestern Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
5 Chicago C (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago G (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
7 Michigan State A (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Illinois B (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Chicago A Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
Total 8.0 5 1 160 0.28 0.00 45

Jonathan Mishory (DII), WUSTL B (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan A Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
3 Chicago F (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 0.00 30
4 Northwestern Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
5 Chicago C (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago G (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
7 Michigan State A (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Illinois B (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Chicago A Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
Total 8.0 15 5 160 0.78 0.00 125

Patrick Butenhoff (DII), WUSTL B (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan A Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
3 Chicago F (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 0.00 50
4 Northwestern Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
5 Chicago C (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 35
6 Chicago G (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 0.00 90
7 Michigan State A (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
8 Illinois B (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
9 Chicago A Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 0.00 30
Total 8.0 31 3 160 1.84 0.00 295

Velimir Petrovic (DII), WUSTL B (DII)

Round Opponent Packet GP 10 -5 TUH P/TU P/N Pts
1 Michigan A Oxford A + Maryland C 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
3 Chicago F (DII) UGA + MSU A + Corn. B + WUSTL A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
4 Northwestern Maryland A + Berkeley B 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 15
5 Chicago C (UG) Yale A + UK A + Michigan B + Camb. 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago G (DII) Duke A + UCF A + Northwestern 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 Michigan State A (UG) UTK A + Illinois A + Princeton 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 0.00 10
8 Illinois B (DII) Columbia A + VCU A 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 0.00 20
9 Chicago A Michigan A + Georgetown 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0
Total 8.0 7 3 160 0.34 0.00 55