Difference between revisions of "Ohio Academic Competition"
Tom D. Moore (talk | contribs) |
m (→Past Champions: the data for (teams) is no longer available) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The '''Ohio Academic Competition (OAC)''' is the format that is used in most Ohio High School quizbowl tournaments. It is the most common format in the state, second to NAQT and television-show formats. Every year, the OAC Committee hosts two tournaments at the end of the season, the Regional Tournaments that are hosted at 6 sites across the state and the State Championship Tournament. The | + | The '''Ohio Academic Competition (OAC)''' is the format that is used in most Ohio High School quizbowl tournaments. It is the most common format in the state, second to NAQT and television-show formats. Every year, the OAC Committee hosts two tournaments at the end of the season, the Regional Tournaments that are hosted at 6 sites across the state and the State Championship Tournament. The format is most beloved for its allowing of conferral that is teams are able to talk to each other at any time. |
== Format == | == Format == | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== Category Round === | === Category Round === | ||
− | In this round, teams are asked questions in ten categories. They are (in order) American Literature, Mathematics, World History, Fine Arts, Life Science, English/World Literature, U.S. Government, Physical Science, World Geography, and U.S. History. | + | In this round, teams are asked questions in ten categories. They are (in order) American Literature, Mathematics, World History, Fine Arts, Life Science, English/World Literature, U.S. Government/Economics, Physical Science, World Geography, and U.S. History. |
− | In each category, the two teams will each receive their own team question. In American Literature, Team A is the first team to receive their question. They will have two opportunities to answer their question within ten seconds. Teams do not need to buzz for this part. If their first response is correct, the team will earn two (2) points. If their second response is correct, they will earn one (1) points If, however, neither of their responses is correct or their ten seconds run out, the opposing team will get an opportunity to "steal" the question for one (1) point. The same process is then reversed, with Team B receiving the first two opportunities to answer the question. After both sides are complete, a toss-up question is read to both teams, and teams only get one opportunity each to answer. A correct answer is worth two (2) points. | + | In each category, the two teams will each receive their own team question. In American Literature, Team A is the first team to receive their question. They will have two opportunities to answer their question within ten seconds. Teams do not need to buzz for this part. If their first response is correct, the team will earn two (2) points. If their second response is correct, they will earn one (1) points If, however, neither of their responses is correct or their ten seconds run out, the opposing team will get an opportunity to "steal" the question for one (1) point. The same process is then reversed, with Team B receiving the first two opportunities to answer the question. After both sides are complete, a pyramidal toss-up question is read to both teams, and teams only get one opportunity each to answer. A correct answer is worth two (2) points. |
In the next category (Mathematics), the order the teams hear the questions are reversed. Team B will get the first math question, and then Team A will get the second question. The third is still a tossup for both teams. This process is repeated throughout all ten categories. | In the next category (Mathematics), the order the teams hear the questions are reversed. Team B will get the first math question, and then Team A will get the second question. The third is still a tossup for both teams. This process is repeated throughout all ten categories. | ||
=== Alphabet Round === | === Alphabet Round === | ||
− | After the category round is complete, teams (after substitution) will receive two sheets of questions, and one "official" answer sheet (aka a blank sheet of paper) to write down their answers to the questions. Both teams receive the exact same set of questions, and all of the answers will begin with the same letter. Usually the letter will either be announced or printed at the top of the question sheet. Teams will have four minutes to answer all questions, with each answer being worth | + | After the category round is complete, teams (after substitution) will receive two sheets of questions, and one "official" answer sheet (aka a blank sheet of paper) to write down their answers to the questions. Both teams receive the exact same set of questions, and all of the answers will begin with the same letter. Usually the letter will either be announced or printed at the top of the question sheet. Teams will have four minutes to answer all questions, with each answer being worth two (2) points. |
− | + | === Final Round === | |
− | + | The third and final part of the match is called the Final Round. In the final round, twenty questions are read to both teams and each correct answer is worth two points each. The questions in the final round are pyramidal and resemble a house-written tossup/bonus set in quality and length. The questions come from the categories listed above, as well as Mythology, Religion, Philosophy, and Social Science. Some forms also include an additional 10 tossup theme round at the end of these 20. These are generally non-pyramidal and do not follow a distribution. They were mostly been left behind when OAC began pursuing becoming "good quizbowl." | |
− | === | ||
− | The third and final part of the match is called the | ||
== OAC Committee == | == OAC Committee == | ||
− | Currently, the OAC Committee has | + | Currently, the OAC Committee has nineteen members, with representation from each region of the state. The Committee has the power to change any of the rules to the OAC format and also approves and places each school into sites for the Regional Tournaments. The members are: |
{| border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" | {| border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
|'''Affiliation''' | |'''Affiliation''' | ||
|'''Region''' | |'''Region''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Joe Czupryn]] | |[[Joe Czupryn]] | ||
|None | |None | ||
− | | | + | |Executive Director |
|- | |- | ||
− | |[[ | + | |[[Bob Kilner]] |
− | |[[ | + | |[[Eastlake North|Eastlake North High School]] |
− | | | + | |North Coast |
|- | |- | ||
− | |[[ | + | |[[Peter Bergman]] |
− | |[[ | + | |[[Solon|Solon High School]] |
− | | | + | |North Coast |
|- | |- | ||
− | |[[ | + | |[[Bob Weiser]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|At-Large Delegate | |At-Large Delegate | ||
− | | | + | |North Coast |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Cameron Flint]] | |[[Cameron Flint]] | ||
|[[Cloverleaf|Cloverleaf High School]] | |[[Cloverleaf|Cloverleaf High School]] | ||
+ | |Northeast | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |[[Joshua Eck]] | ||
+ | |[[Copley|Copley High School]] | ||
|Northeast | |Northeast | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 72: | Line 55: | ||
|[[Copley|Copley High School]] | |[[Copley|Copley High School]] | ||
|Northeast | |Northeast | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Alex Melton]] | |[[Alex Melton]] | ||
Line 88: | Line 63: | ||
|[[Van Wert|Van Wert High School]] | |[[Van Wert|Van Wert High School]] | ||
|Northwest | |Northwest | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |Vacant | ||
+ | |At-Large Delegate | ||
|Northwest | |Northwest | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |[[Lynn Stevenson]] |
− | |[[ | + | |[[Fisher Catholic|Fisher Catholic High School]] |
− | | | + | |Southeast |
|- | |- | ||
− | + | |[[Alex Connor]] | |
− | |[[ | + | |[[St. Charles|St. Charles Preparatory School]] |
− | |[[ | + | |Southeast |
|- | |- | ||
+ | |[[Mike Sedlack]] | ||
+ | |[[Fisher Catholic|Fisher Catholic High School]] | ||
|Southeast | |Southeast | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |[[Brian Meeron]] | ||
+ | |[[Walnut Hills|Walnut Hills High School]] | ||
+ | |Southwest | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |[[Ron Maupin]] | ||
+ | |[[Little Miami|Little Miami High School]] | ||
+ | |Southwest | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |[[Ryan Shandle]] | ||
+ | |Cincinnati State | ||
|Southwest | |Southwest | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |[[Joe Bellas]] | ||
+ | |[[Tippecanoe|Tippecanoe High School]] | ||
+ | |West Central | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |[[David Jones]] | ||
+ | |[[Northmont|Northmont High School]] | ||
+ | |West Central | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |[[Ellen Spence]] | ||
+ | |[[Beavercreek|Beavercreek High School]] | ||
|West Central | |West Central | ||
− | |[[ | + | |- |
− | |[[ | + | |[[Brian Easterling]] |
+ | |[[Ohio State|The Ohio State University]] | ||
+ | |College Representative | ||
+ | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Regional Tournaments == | ||
+ | Currently, tournaments are held at six different regions throughout the state. This was an expansion from the early 2000s when there were only four regions. There has been dialogue, arising as recently as May 2015, that the regional tournament could see another expansion to the size of eight regional tournaments, however this will likely not come to fruition until there is a guarantee it can be feasibly done and ran effectively. | ||
+ | |||
+ | When teams arrive they will take a Seeding Quiz that consists of 50 questions on paper. The questions get harder as the numbers increase, and The teams will be seeded based on the highest number of correct answers. The tiebreaker is the highest number question that is correctly answered. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each regional tournament holds a maximum of 16 teams. These teams will all face-off in a double-elimination tournament, where the first and second place teams will be sent to the State Tournament in Columbus. To qualify for a regional tournament, a team must win a tournament (or a division of one) with at minimum six schools competing. The winner must be specifically identified. If there is a tie for first, somehow only one winner must be determined. Note that Ohio teams that win tournaments in other states can now automatically qualify for the OAC Regional tournament given that they meet the qualification requirements, such as winning a bracket comprising of six different schools. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
== State Tournament == | == State Tournament == | ||
− | The State Championship Tournament is held | + | The State Championship Tournament is generally held in Columbus, Ohio. A team is eligible for the State Tournament if the finish in the first or second place at their respective regional site, or if they earn one of the at large bids. Starting in 2018, teams are seeded based on their statistics from regionals. Each team is ranked based on are their alphabet round average plus their average team category points multiplied by two. Those stats are also what is used to determine who gets the 4 wild card bids. Sixteen teams compete in each years state championship tournament. |
− | + | The format of the tournament itself is a double elimination bracket. For teams that lose their second game in the same round, there is pool play to determine precise placement. | |
== Past Champions == | == Past Champions == | ||
{| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1" | {| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1" | ||
|-style="background: #e3e3e3;" | |-style="background: #e3e3e3;" | ||
− | |'''Year | + | |'''Year''' |
|'''Champion''' | |'''Champion''' | ||
|'''Region''' | |'''Region''' | ||
Line 146: | Line 133: | ||
|'''Region''' | |'''Region''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2015 | + | | 2023 |
+ | | [[Solon]] | ||
+ | | NC | ||
+ | | [[Northmont]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2022 | ||
+ | | [[Solon]] | ||
+ | | NC | ||
+ | | [[Beavercreek]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2021 | ||
+ | | [[Beavercreek]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | | [[Solon]] | ||
+ | | NC | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2020 | ||
+ | | [[CANCELED]] | ||
+ | | N/A | ||
+ | | [[COVID-19]] | ||
+ | | N/A | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2019 | ||
+ | | [[Beavercreek]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | | [[Miami Valley]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2018 | ||
+ | | [[Beavercreek]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | | [[Miami Valley]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2017 | ||
+ | | [[Beavercreek]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | | [[Fisher Catholic]] | ||
+ | | SE | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2016 | ||
+ | | [[Solon]] | ||
+ | | NC | ||
+ | | [[Sidney]] | ||
+ | | WC | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2015 | ||
|[[Northmont]] | |[[Northmont]] | ||
|WC | |WC | ||
Line 152: | Line 188: | ||
|WC | |WC | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2014 | + | |2014 |
|[[Northmont]] | |[[Northmont]] | ||
|WC | |WC | ||
Line 158: | Line 194: | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2013 | + | |2013 |
|[[Northmont]] | |[[Northmont]] | ||
|WC | |WC | ||
Line 164: | Line 200: | ||
|NC | |NC | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2012 | + | |2012 |
|[[Olmsted Falls]] | |[[Olmsted Falls]] | ||
|NC | |NC | ||
Line 170: | Line 206: | ||
|WC | |WC | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2011 | + | |2011 |
|[[Copley]] | |[[Copley]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 176: | Line 212: | ||
|WC | |WC | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2010 | + | |2010 |
|[[Solon]] | |[[Solon]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 182: | Line 218: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2009 | + | |2009 |
|[[Green]] | |[[Green]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 188: | Line 224: | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2008 | + | |2008 |
|[[Garfield Heights]] | |[[Garfield Heights]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 194: | Line 230: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2007 | + | |2007 |
|[[Garfield Heights]] | |[[Garfield Heights]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 200: | Line 236: | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2006 | + | |2006 |
|[[Fisher Catholic]] | |[[Fisher Catholic]] | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
Line 206: | Line 242: | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2005 | + | |2005 |
|[[Copley]] | |[[Copley]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 212: | Line 248: | ||
|WC | |WC | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2004 | + | |2004 |
|[[Fisher Catholic]] | |[[Fisher Catholic]] | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
Line 218: | Line 254: | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2003 | + | |2003 |
|[[St. Charles]] | |[[St. Charles]] | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
Line 224: | Line 260: | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2002 | + | |2002 |
|[[Copley]] | |[[Copley]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 230: | Line 266: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2001 | + | |2001 |
|[[Beavercreek]] | |[[Beavercreek]] | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
Line 236: | Line 272: | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2000 | + | |2000 |
|[[Beavercreek]] | |[[Beavercreek]] | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
Line 242: | Line 278: | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1999 | + | |1999 |
|[[Copley]] | |[[Copley]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 248: | Line 284: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1998 | + | |1998 |
|[[Copley]] | |[[Copley]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 254: | Line 290: | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1997 | + | |1997 |
|[[St. Xavier]] | |[[St. Xavier]] | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
Line 260: | Line 296: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1996 | + | |1996 |
|[[Brecksville-Broadview Heights]] | |[[Brecksville-Broadview Heights]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 266: | Line 302: | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1995 | + | |1995 |
|[[Copley]] | |[[Copley]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 272: | Line 308: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1994 | + | |1994 |
|[[Beavercreek]] | |[[Beavercreek]] | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
Line 278: | Line 314: | ||
|NW | |NW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1993 | + | |1993 |
|[[Elyria]] | |[[Elyria]] | ||
|NW | |NW | ||
Line 284: | Line 320: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1992 | + | |1992 |
|[[Beachwood]] | |[[Beachwood]] | ||
|NW | |NW | ||
Line 290: | Line 326: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1991 | + | |1991 |
|[[Wellington Academy]] | |[[Wellington Academy]] | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
Line 296: | Line 332: | ||
|NW | |NW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1990 | + | |1990 |
|[[Beavercreek]] | |[[Beavercreek]] | ||
|SW | |SW | ||
Line 302: | Line 338: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1989 | + | |1989 |
|[[Gilmour Academy]] | |[[Gilmour Academy]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 308: | Line 344: | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1988 | + | |1988 |
|[[Gilmour Academy]] | |[[Gilmour Academy]] | ||
|NE | |NE | ||
Line 314: | Line 350: | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1987 | + | |1987 |
|[[Norwalk]] | |[[Norwalk]] | ||
|NW | |NW | ||
Line 320: | Line 356: | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1986 | + | |1986 |
|[[Wheelersburg]] | |[[Wheelersburg]] | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
Line 326: | Line 362: | ||
|NW | |NW | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1985 | + | |1985 |
|[[Wheelersburg]] | |[[Wheelersburg]] | ||
|SE | |SE | ||
Line 334: | Line 370: | ||
== Criticisms == | == Criticisms == | ||
− | + | * In the 2008 Regional Tournaments, many sites had different drawings of what the Double-Elimination brackets could look like, causing some teams to play different schedules than if they had been assigned to another region. One region in particular (EC) had confusing brackets that some teams had troubles understanding. | |
− | * | + | * The random-draw method previously used to assign teams at the regional and state tournaments was considered controversial. Prior to it's removal, at states the six regional champions draw red 1,2 or 3 or blue 1,2 or 3. The regional runners-up from the same region are then place in the opposite brackets. While this may seem fair, the fact that OAC format does not usually single out the best teams causes a draw as in 2007, where Fisher Catholic (NAQT-2nd), Tippecanoe (NAQT-1st), Copley (NAQT-3rd) and North Canton Hoover were all placed in the same half of the bracket, while Walnut Hills (generally considered the strongest NAQT team in Ohio) and Garfield Heights were in the other bracket. |
− | * The | + | * The distribution is affected by the format itself. The final round distribution is in live with modern standards, but as a whole the category and alphabet rounds change it. For example, RMPSS is only included in the final round, and in the category round half of the literature is American, while commonwealth, European and world only combines to half of the literature. |
== External Links == | == External Links == | ||
− | *[ | + | * [https://sites.google.com/site/ohioacademiccompetition/home Ohio Academic Competition website] |
+ | * [https://www.facebook.com/OACCommittee/?fref=ts OAC on Facebook] | ||
[[Category:High school formats]] | [[Category:High school formats]] | ||
[[Category:High school quizbowl in Ohio]] | [[Category:High school quizbowl in Ohio]] | ||
− | |||
[[Category:Original QBWiki Page]] | [[Category:Original QBWiki Page]] | ||
+ | [[Category:State Quizbowl Organizations]] |
Latest revision as of 00:10, 10 March 2024
The Ohio Academic Competition (OAC) is the format that is used in most Ohio High School quizbowl tournaments. It is the most common format in the state, second to NAQT and television-show formats. Every year, the OAC Committee hosts two tournaments at the end of the season, the Regional Tournaments that are hosted at 6 sites across the state and the State Championship Tournament. The format is most beloved for its allowing of conferral that is teams are able to talk to each other at any time.
Format
Like most formats, two teams compete in a match. The rules state that the sides are chosen by a coin flip, although more recently moderators simply used the side the team picks to be "Team A" and "Team B". Therefore, the team that sits to the moderator's left will generally be "Team A" and the team on the moderator's right will be "Team B".
While some tournaments may slightly deviate from the official rules, there are generally three parts to an OAC match. They are the category round, the alphabet round, and the lightning round. Teams are permitted to substitute between rounds.
Category Round
In this round, teams are asked questions in ten categories. They are (in order) American Literature, Mathematics, World History, Fine Arts, Life Science, English/World Literature, U.S. Government/Economics, Physical Science, World Geography, and U.S. History.
In each category, the two teams will each receive their own team question. In American Literature, Team A is the first team to receive their question. They will have two opportunities to answer their question within ten seconds. Teams do not need to buzz for this part. If their first response is correct, the team will earn two (2) points. If their second response is correct, they will earn one (1) points If, however, neither of their responses is correct or their ten seconds run out, the opposing team will get an opportunity to "steal" the question for one (1) point. The same process is then reversed, with Team B receiving the first two opportunities to answer the question. After both sides are complete, a pyramidal toss-up question is read to both teams, and teams only get one opportunity each to answer. A correct answer is worth two (2) points.
In the next category (Mathematics), the order the teams hear the questions are reversed. Team B will get the first math question, and then Team A will get the second question. The third is still a tossup for both teams. This process is repeated throughout all ten categories.
Alphabet Round
After the category round is complete, teams (after substitution) will receive two sheets of questions, and one "official" answer sheet (aka a blank sheet of paper) to write down their answers to the questions. Both teams receive the exact same set of questions, and all of the answers will begin with the same letter. Usually the letter will either be announced or printed at the top of the question sheet. Teams will have four minutes to answer all questions, with each answer being worth two (2) points.
Final Round
The third and final part of the match is called the Final Round. In the final round, twenty questions are read to both teams and each correct answer is worth two points each. The questions in the final round are pyramidal and resemble a house-written tossup/bonus set in quality and length. The questions come from the categories listed above, as well as Mythology, Religion, Philosophy, and Social Science. Some forms also include an additional 10 tossup theme round at the end of these 20. These are generally non-pyramidal and do not follow a distribution. They were mostly been left behind when OAC began pursuing becoming "good quizbowl."
OAC Committee
Currently, the OAC Committee has nineteen members, with representation from each region of the state. The Committee has the power to change any of the rules to the OAC format and also approves and places each school into sites for the Regional Tournaments. The members are:
Member Name | Affiliation | Region |
Joe Czupryn | None | Executive Director |
Bob Kilner | Eastlake North High School | North Coast |
Peter Bergman | Solon High School | North Coast |
Bob Weiser | At-Large Delegate | North Coast |
Cameron Flint | Cloverleaf High School | Northeast |
Joshua Eck | Copley High School | Northeast |
Sue Korosa | Copley High School | Northeast |
Alex Melton | Benjamin Logan High School | Northwest |
Anita Zuber | Van Wert High School | Northwest |
Vacant | At-Large Delegate | Northwest |
Lynn Stevenson | Fisher Catholic High School | Southeast |
Alex Connor | St. Charles Preparatory School | Southeast |
Mike Sedlack | Fisher Catholic High School | Southeast |
Brian Meeron | Walnut Hills High School | Southwest |
Ron Maupin | Little Miami High School | Southwest |
Ryan Shandle | Cincinnati State | Southwest |
Joe Bellas | Tippecanoe High School | West Central |
David Jones | Northmont High School | West Central |
Ellen Spence | Beavercreek High School | West Central |
Brian Easterling | The Ohio State University | College Representative |
Regional Tournaments
Currently, tournaments are held at six different regions throughout the state. This was an expansion from the early 2000s when there were only four regions. There has been dialogue, arising as recently as May 2015, that the regional tournament could see another expansion to the size of eight regional tournaments, however this will likely not come to fruition until there is a guarantee it can be feasibly done and ran effectively.
When teams arrive they will take a Seeding Quiz that consists of 50 questions on paper. The questions get harder as the numbers increase, and The teams will be seeded based on the highest number of correct answers. The tiebreaker is the highest number question that is correctly answered.
Each regional tournament holds a maximum of 16 teams. These teams will all face-off in a double-elimination tournament, where the first and second place teams will be sent to the State Tournament in Columbus. To qualify for a regional tournament, a team must win a tournament (or a division of one) with at minimum six schools competing. The winner must be specifically identified. If there is a tie for first, somehow only one winner must be determined. Note that Ohio teams that win tournaments in other states can now automatically qualify for the OAC Regional tournament given that they meet the qualification requirements, such as winning a bracket comprising of six different schools.
State Tournament
The State Championship Tournament is generally held in Columbus, Ohio. A team is eligible for the State Tournament if the finish in the first or second place at their respective regional site, or if they earn one of the at large bids. Starting in 2018, teams are seeded based on their statistics from regionals. Each team is ranked based on are their alphabet round average plus their average team category points multiplied by two. Those stats are also what is used to determine who gets the 4 wild card bids. Sixteen teams compete in each years state championship tournament.
The format of the tournament itself is a double elimination bracket. For teams that lose their second game in the same round, there is pool play to determine precise placement.
Past Champions
Criticisms
- In the 2008 Regional Tournaments, many sites had different drawings of what the Double-Elimination brackets could look like, causing some teams to play different schedules than if they had been assigned to another region. One region in particular (EC) had confusing brackets that some teams had troubles understanding.
- The random-draw method previously used to assign teams at the regional and state tournaments was considered controversial. Prior to it's removal, at states the six regional champions draw red 1,2 or 3 or blue 1,2 or 3. The regional runners-up from the same region are then place in the opposite brackets. While this may seem fair, the fact that OAC format does not usually single out the best teams causes a draw as in 2007, where Fisher Catholic (NAQT-2nd), Tippecanoe (NAQT-1st), Copley (NAQT-3rd) and North Canton Hoover were all placed in the same half of the bracket, while Walnut Hills (generally considered the strongest NAQT team in Ohio) and Garfield Heights were in the other bracket.
- The distribution is affected by the format itself. The final round distribution is in live with modern standards, but as a whole the category and alphabet rounds change it. For example, RMPSS is only included in the final round, and in the category round half of the literature is American, while commonwealth, European and world only combines to half of the literature.