Difference between revisions of "Talk:Andy Watkins Cheating Scandal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
James Zhou (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think the best solution would be to either expand the [[2013 NAQT Cheating Scandal]] article (since there were multiple figures involved) in addition to keeping this page (because there is a lot more material to write about), or to move the contents of this page to the other one. Either way, it wouldn't be suitable to place the entire group of scandals in an article about just one case. [[User:James Zhou|James Zhou]] ([[User talk:James Zhou|talk]]) 21:08, 12 March 2014 (PDT) | I think the best solution would be to either expand the [[2013 NAQT Cheating Scandal]] article (since there were multiple figures involved) in addition to keeping this page (because there is a lot more material to write about), or to move the contents of this page to the other one. Either way, it wouldn't be suitable to place the entire group of scandals in an article about just one case. [[User:James Zhou|James Zhou]] ([[User talk:James Zhou|talk]]) 21:08, 12 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Go for it. [[User:David Reinstein|David Reinstein]] ([[User talk:David Reinstein|talk]]) 09:13, 13 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:13, 13 March 2014
Should this be merged with 2013 NAQT Cheating Scandal? James Zhou (talk) 08:15, 12 March 2014 (PDT)
That page doesn't say much. I don't see any harm in redirecting it here. David Reinstein (talk) 19:32, 12 March 2014 (PDT)
I think the best solution would be to either expand the 2013 NAQT Cheating Scandal article (since there were multiple figures involved) in addition to keeping this page (because there is a lot more material to write about), or to move the contents of this page to the other one. Either way, it wouldn't be suitable to place the entire group of scandals in an article about just one case. James Zhou (talk) 21:08, 12 March 2014 (PDT)
Go for it. David Reinstein (talk) 09:13, 13 March 2014 (PDT)