Talk:BATE - Revision history

Fred Morlan at 23:03, 12 July 2011

2011-07-12T23:03:11Z

Matt Jackson at 23:00, 12 July 2011

2011-07-12T23:00:22Z

David Reinstein at 21:48, 12 July 2011

2011-07-12T21:48:28Z

Fred Morlan at 20:44, 12 July 2011

2011-07-12T20:44:50Z

David Reinstein at 14:23, 12 July 2011

2011-07-12T14:23:48Z

Fred Morlan at 03:57, 12 July 2011

2011-07-12T03:57:24Z

Fred Morlan: Created page with 'This would probably be best served by splitting it into pages about the new version (with updated info, of course) and info on the old, "Jeopardy" version. Thoughts? --~~~~'

2011-07-12T03:51:17Z

Created page with 'This would probably be best served by splitting it into pages about the new version (with updated info, of course) and info on the old, "Jeopardy" version. Thoughts? --~~~~'

New page

This would probably be best served by splitting it into pages about the new version (with updated info, of course) and info on the old, "Jeopardy" version. Thoughts? --[[User:Fred Morlan|Fred Morlan]] 03:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 12 July 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Eh, why bother? --[[User:Matt Jackson\|Matt Jackson]] 18:59, 12 July 2011 (do i have to add this ID myself)		Eh, why bother? --[[User:Matt Jackson\|Matt Jackson]] 18:59, 12 July 2011 (do i have to add this ID myself)
		+
		+	Because they really are two separate subjects, and the second BATE set wasn't even used at that year's BATE tournament. Also, bothering would take about 3 minutes. --[[User:Fred Morlan\|Fred Morlan]] 23:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 12 July 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:

	makes sense to me [[User:David Reinstein\|David Reinstein]] 21:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)		makes sense to me [[User:David Reinstein\|David Reinstein]] 21:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	Eh, why bother? --[[User:Matt Jackson\|Matt Jackson]] 18:59, 12 July 2011 (do i have to add this ID myself)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 12 July 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I actually give this further thought, and think it might be best if we split it into two pages: one for discussion of the Bloomfield tournament commonly known as "BATE" and one for the tournament set called "BATE" that kind of spawned from the tournament. Does that sound better?--[[User:Fred Morlan\|Fred Morlan]] 20:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)		I actually give this further thought, and think it might be best if we split it into two pages: one for discussion of the Bloomfield tournament commonly known as "BATE" and one for the tournament set called "BATE" that kind of spawned from the tournament. Does that sound better?--[[User:Fred Morlan\|Fred Morlan]] 20:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	makes sense to me [[User:David Reinstein\|David Reinstein]] 21:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 12 July 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I would think that the only reason for two separate articles would be the idea that at some point they would both have substantive information. If you think that at some point in the reasonably near future that there will be significant information on the old version on this wiki, then this probably should be two pages. If not, then I don't think it's a problem to just have the old version basically be a footnote to the new version, like it is now. [[User:David Reinstein\|David Reinstein]] 14:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)		I would think that the only reason for two separate articles would be the idea that at some point they would both have substantive information. If you think that at some point in the reasonably near future that there will be significant information on the old version on this wiki, then this probably should be two pages. If not, then I don't think it's a problem to just have the old version basically be a footnote to the new version, like it is now. [[User:David Reinstein\|David Reinstein]] 14:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	I actually give this further thought, and think it might be best if we split it into two pages: one for discussion of the Bloomfield tournament commonly known as "BATE" and one for the tournament set called "BATE" that kind of spawned from the tournament. Does that sound better?--[[User:Fred Morlan\|Fred Morlan]] 20:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, 12 July 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Additional info: old style BATE [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4752&p=69360]. Newer versions, in chronological order: [http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=101417#p101417 2009], [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=8887 2010], [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=10868&p=203748 2011].		Additional info: old style BATE [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4752&p=69360]. Newer versions, in chronological order: [http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=101417#p101417 2009], [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=8887 2010], [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=10868&p=203748 2011].
		+
		+	I would think that the only reason for two separate articles would be the idea that at some point they would both have substantive information. If you think that at some point in the reasonably near future that there will be significant information on the old version on this wiki, then this probably should be two pages. If not, then I don't think it's a problem to just have the old version basically be a footnote to the new version, like it is now. [[User:David Reinstein\|David Reinstein]] 14:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 12 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This would probably be best served by splitting it into pages about the new version (with updated info, of course) and info on the old, "Jeopardy" version. Thoughts? --[[User:Fred Morlan\|Fred Morlan]] 03:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)		This would probably be best served by splitting it into pages about the new version (with updated info, of course) and info on the old, "Jeopardy" version. Thoughts? --[[User:Fred Morlan\|Fred Morlan]] 03:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	Additional info: old style BATE [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=4752&p=69360]. Newer versions, in chronological order: [http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=101417#p101417 2009], [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=8887 2010], [http://hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=10868&p=203748 2011].