Difference between revisions of "Arminius scandal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(link) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Occurred at the [[2006 ICT]] when [[R. Hentzel]] combined a rule that does not exist with a fact that is not true to deny a protest that he did not research. The decision ultimately cost [[VCU]] the third-place spot at the tournament.[http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2610] | Occurred at the [[2006 ICT]] when [[R. Hentzel]] combined a rule that does not exist with a fact that is not true to deny a protest that he did not research. The decision ultimately cost [[VCU]] the third-place spot at the tournament.[http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2610] | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article may be biased. | ||
[[Category:Quizbowl scandals]] | [[Category:Quizbowl scandals]] | ||
[[Category:Original QBWiki Page]] | [[Category:Original QBWiki Page]] | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 10 March 2019
Occurred at the 2006 ICT when R. Hentzel combined a rule that does not exist with a fact that is not true to deny a protest that he did not research. The decision ultimately cost VCU the third-place spot at the tournament.[1]
This article may be biased.