Difference between revisions of "List studying"
(start) |
(fix) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Notable examples== | ==Notable examples== | ||
| − | *[[Wheaton North]] famously has a "Two- and Three-Word Clues" list all players were expected to know. The list consists of descriptions matched to the only common quizbowl answer they | + | *[[Wheaton North]] famously has a "Two- and Three-Word Clues" list all players were expected to know. The list consists of descriptions matched to the only common quizbowl answer they identify ("Danish philosopher", "Norwegian playwright", etc.). |
Revision as of 17:51, 14 July 2013
List studying is a technique of improving in quiz bowl by memorizing information presented in list form. The list can either have a specific order (such as a chronological list of US presidents) or it can be a collection of flashcard-like items (such as naming the author from a given title).
Efficacy
List studying can be advantageous for learning a lot of keyword associations in a short period of time. It can also be effective for learning basic knowledge, such as well-known titles and authors.
List studying has major problems though in comparison to other study activities. Lists tend not to provide any sort of framework for the data on the list, making the contents harder to remember. Many toss-up questions also tend to use descriptions rather than keywords in the early clues, rewarding players with real knowledge over players who solely engage in list studying.
Notable examples
- Wheaton North famously has a "Two- and Three-Word Clues" list all players were expected to know. The list consists of descriptions matched to the only common quizbowl answer they identify ("Danish philosopher", "Norwegian playwright", etc.).