Difference between revisions of "List studying"
Jacob Reed (talk | contribs) |
Matt Jackson (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''List studying''' is a technique of improving in quiz bowl by memorizing information presented in list form. The list can either have a specific order (such as a chronological list of US presidents) or it can be a collection of flashcard-like items (such as naming the author from a given title). | + | '''List studying''' is a technique of improving in quiz bowl by memorizing information presented in list form. The list can either have a specific order (such as a chronological list of US presidents) or it can be a collection of [[flashcard]]-like items (such as naming the author from a given title). |
==Efficacy== | ==Efficacy== | ||
List studying can be advantageous for learning a lot of keyword associations in a short period of time. It can also be effective for learning basic knowledge, such as well-known titles and authors. | List studying can be advantageous for learning a lot of keyword associations in a short period of time. It can also be effective for learning basic knowledge, such as well-known titles and authors. | ||
| − | List studying has major problems though in comparison to other study activities. Lists tend not to provide any sort of framework for the data on the list, making the contents harder to remember. | + | List studying has major problems, though, in comparison to other study activities. Lists tend not to provide any sort of framework or context for the data on the list, making the contents harder to remember. [[Good]] tossups usually use descriptions rather than merely stating keywords in the early clues, rewarding players with real knowledge over players who solely engage in list studying. |
==Notable proponents== | ==Notable proponents== | ||
*[[Brendan Byrne]] | *[[Brendan Byrne]] | ||
*[[Wheaton North]] famously has a "Two- and Three-Word Clues" list all players were expected to know. The list consists of descriptions matched to the only common quizbowl answer they identify ("Danish philosopher", "Norwegian playwright", etc.). | *[[Wheaton North]] famously has a "Two- and Three-Word Clues" list all players were expected to know. The list consists of descriptions matched to the only common quizbowl answer they identify ("Danish philosopher", "Norwegian playwright", etc.). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Frequency list]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Quizbowl improvement methods]] | ||
Revision as of 11:44, 16 July 2013
List studying is a technique of improving in quiz bowl by memorizing information presented in list form. The list can either have a specific order (such as a chronological list of US presidents) or it can be a collection of flashcard-like items (such as naming the author from a given title).
Efficacy
List studying can be advantageous for learning a lot of keyword associations in a short period of time. It can also be effective for learning basic knowledge, such as well-known titles and authors.
List studying has major problems, though, in comparison to other study activities. Lists tend not to provide any sort of framework or context for the data on the list, making the contents harder to remember. Good tossups usually use descriptions rather than merely stating keywords in the early clues, rewarding players with real knowledge over players who solely engage in list studying.
Notable proponents
- Brendan Byrne
- Wheaton North famously has a "Two- and Three-Word Clues" list all players were expected to know. The list consists of descriptions matched to the only common quizbowl answer they identify ("Danish philosopher", "Norwegian playwright", etc.).