Difference between revisions of "SCT"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
fix>QBWikiBot
 
(needed a lot of updating)
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''NAQT Sectionals''' (also known as '''SCT''' or the '''Sectional Championship Tournament'''), is an annual collegiate tournament run on [[NAQT]] questions and rules hosted at many different colleges throughout the United States (and occasionally [[Canada]]).
 
'''NAQT Sectionals''' (also known as '''SCT''' or the '''Sectional Championship Tournament'''), is an annual collegiate tournament run on [[NAQT]] questions and rules hosted at many different colleges throughout the United States (and occasionally [[Canada]]).
  
Like many NAQT tournaments--although unlike almost all other college tournaments--Sectionals makes use of [[timed tournaments|timed rounds]].
+
Sectionals also divides teams up into [[Division I]] and [[Division II]] brackets, provided there are enough teams, and awards recognition for the top undergraduate team playing in Division I. Each Division I packet has 24 tossups and 24 bonuses at collegiate [[regular difficulty]], while Divison II packet questions are significantly easier. Some questions written for one set will overlap with the other or have an adjusted-difficulty version in the other set in the same round.
  
Sectionals also divides teams up into [[Division I]] and [[Division II]] brackets, provided there are enough teams, and awards recognition for the top undergraduate team playing in Division I.
+
==History==
==Sections==
+
In November 2009, NAQT announced a partnership with [[ACUI]]. As part of this deal, the section format used by NAQT was dropped in favor of ACUI's regions. As a result, several sites in 2011 were chosen with little to no regard for quiz bowl in the area. This led to confusion and complaints about SUNY-New Paltz for Region 2, Moravian for Region 4 (3 was added as well), and East Carolina for Region 5. This may have had more to do with NAQT trying to collect bids in August, a full 7 months before the tournaments and while virtually all clubs were on break. The ACUI partnership ended after the 2013 SCTs.
* [[NAQT SCT Canada|Canada]]
+
 
* [[NAQT SCT Northeast|Northeast]]
+
Since 2009, SCT has often been "guest-edited" by one or more active college players, who sit out SCT but receive an automatic bid to the [[ICT]] for their team. [[Seth Teitler]] was the first person to do this.
* [[NAQT SCT Mid-Atlantic|Mid-Atlantic]]
+
 
* [[NAQT SCT Mideast|Mideast]]
+
From the first SCTs in 1997 through 2017, all SCTs were [[timed]]. The 2018 SCTs will be untimed as an experiment in response to community concerns about timing (especially with the difficulty of recruiting quality moderators).
* [[NAQT SCT Great Lakes|Great Lakes]]
 
* [[NAQT SCT Southeast|Southeast]]
 
* [[NAQT SCT South|South]]
 
* [[NAQT SCT Southwest|Southwest]]
 
* [[NAQT SCT Midwest|Midwest]]
 
* [[NAQT SCT North|North]]
 
* [[NAQT SCT Northwest|Northwest]]
 
* [[NAQT SCT West|West]]
 
  
==History==
 
  
 
==Reception==
 
==Reception==
The 2007 Sectionals was generally better received than in previous years, thanks to the efforts of [[Andrew Yaphe]] editing the tournament.
+
SCT is sometimes [[NAQT#Controversy and Criticism|criticized]] with respect to its [[subject distribution]] and/or [[difficulty]]. These issues have been raised less in recent years due to improving quality and increasing acceptance of distributions other than the [[ACF distribution]].
 
 
However, some players continue to criticize Sectionals for its use of the timed format (often combined with bad moderators), a distribution that is heavy on trash, current events and geography, and repeated occurrences of badly written questions.
 
  
In response to these criticisms (and of criticisms of the [[ICT]]), NAQT released surveys following the 2006 and 2007 ICTs.  The lack of significant changes to Sectionals and the ICT following these surveys have led some players to view them as window dressing or otherwise problematic.  See the [[NAQT]] page for more information on this subject.
+
{{Navbox NAQT}}
  
[[Category:Stubs]]
+
[[Category: Tournaments]]
[[Category:Tournaments]]
+
[[Category: NAQT]]
[[Category:NAQT]]
+
[[Category: Original QBWiki Page]]
[[Category:Original QBWiki Page]]
 

Revision as of 22:42, 18 December 2017

NAQT Sectionals (also known as SCT or the Sectional Championship Tournament), is an annual collegiate tournament run on NAQT questions and rules hosted at many different colleges throughout the United States (and occasionally Canada).

Sectionals also divides teams up into Division I and Division II brackets, provided there are enough teams, and awards recognition for the top undergraduate team playing in Division I. Each Division I packet has 24 tossups and 24 bonuses at collegiate regular difficulty, while Divison II packet questions are significantly easier. Some questions written for one set will overlap with the other or have an adjusted-difficulty version in the other set in the same round.

History

In November 2009, NAQT announced a partnership with ACUI. As part of this deal, the section format used by NAQT was dropped in favor of ACUI's regions. As a result, several sites in 2011 were chosen with little to no regard for quiz bowl in the area. This led to confusion and complaints about SUNY-New Paltz for Region 2, Moravian for Region 4 (3 was added as well), and East Carolina for Region 5. This may have had more to do with NAQT trying to collect bids in August, a full 7 months before the tournaments and while virtually all clubs were on break. The ACUI partnership ended after the 2013 SCTs.

Since 2009, SCT has often been "guest-edited" by one or more active college players, who sit out SCT but receive an automatic bid to the ICT for their team. Seth Teitler was the first person to do this.

From the first SCTs in 1997 through 2017, all SCTs were timed. The 2018 SCTs will be untimed as an experiment in response to community concerns about timing (especially with the difficulty of recruiting quality moderators).


Reception

SCT is sometimes criticized with respect to its subject distribution and/or difficulty. These issues have been raised less in recent years due to improving quality and increasing acceptance of distributions other than the ACF distribution.