Difference between revisions of "Talk:Division I and Division II"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kevin Wang (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I tried to make the links to the exact wordings for the eligibility rules prominent on the page but this is a reasonable argument - I would not object to paring this page down to only include generalities about the differences between ACF and NAQT eligibility rules. -[[User:Kevin Wang|Kevin Wang]] ([[User talk:Kevin Wang|talk]]) 18:48, 8 April 2021 (CDT) | :I tried to make the links to the exact wordings for the eligibility rules prominent on the page but this is a reasonable argument - I would not object to paring this page down to only include generalities about the differences between ACF and NAQT eligibility rules. -[[User:Kevin Wang|Kevin Wang]] ([[User talk:Kevin Wang|talk]]) 18:48, 8 April 2021 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I would be in favor of that change. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 19:05, 8 April 2021 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:05, 8 April 2021
Stating the exact rules
I don't like the idea of stating organizations' exact eligibility rules here. In many cases, the rules are intricate and very carefully worded, so summarizing/rewording them is dicey. Furthermore, rules change, and it's best not to have to update them in multiple places (especially places outside the control of the organizations promulgating the rules). I'd much rather give a high-level summary (along the lines of what the page consisted of prior to today) and refer people to the canonical sources of rules. Jonah (talk) 10:19, 8 April 2021 (CDT)
- I tried to make the links to the exact wordings for the eligibility rules prominent on the page but this is a reasonable argument - I would not object to paring this page down to only include generalities about the differences between ACF and NAQT eligibility rules. -Kevin Wang (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2021 (CDT)