User talk:Wyatt Carpenter
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The QBWiki is not the place for in-jokes. Jonah (talk) 15:50, 25 June 2016 (CDT)
- While I respect that you are the admin of this wiki, and thus control its direction, I believe Category:In-jokes demonstrates that QBWiki is a great place for in-jokes, and that QBWiki would be incomplete without them. --Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2016 (CDT)
- That category is for well-known inside jokes that have had currency on the circuit as a whole, not incomprehensible nonsense that arose (and as far as I can tell, remained) within a single team. Those pages explain the jokes (more or less), rather than embedding them in legitimate pages. Jonah (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2016 (CDT)
- Okay, I understand. It does leave me in sort of a pickle, though, because I want to chronicle the entire history of my team, including the incomprehensible nonsense. Would it be alright with you if I recorded the in-jokes on a subpage of my user page (E.g. User:Wyatt Carpenter/In-jokes)? The serious content would remain on the Inglemoor page.--Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 09:48, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- My opinion is that such a thing would be much better on a team Facebook group or something like that, but as a matter of policy, I'm okay with you putting in-jokes on such a sub-page as long as none of them are obscene, rude, mean, or otherwise offensive in any way. Jonah (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- Alright. Thank you very much. --Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 20:24, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- My opinion is that such a thing would be much better on a team Facebook group or something like that, but as a matter of policy, I'm okay with you putting in-jokes on such a sub-page as long as none of them are obscene, rude, mean, or otherwise offensive in any way. Jonah (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- Okay, I understand. It does leave me in sort of a pickle, though, because I want to chronicle the entire history of my team, including the incomprehensible nonsense. Would it be alright with you if I recorded the in-jokes on a subpage of my user page (E.g. User:Wyatt Carpenter/In-jokes)? The serious content would remain on the Inglemoor page.--Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 09:48, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- That category is for well-known inside jokes that have had currency on the circuit as a whole, not incomprehensible nonsense that arose (and as far as I can tell, remained) within a single team. Those pages explain the jokes (more or less), rather than embedding them in legitimate pages. Jonah (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2016 (CDT)