Re: HBCU vs. CBI

The run-down...

Honda Campus All-Star
Challenge (HCASC) is an event run by College Bowl Company,
Inc (CBI) - the organization that runs College
Bowl.

CBI mandates that Historically Black Colleges and
Universities (HBCUs) can either participate in HCASC or
College Bowl - but not both. Since HCASC
gives a fair
amount of scholarship money to participants, HCASC is
better financially.

Some people oppose this on
the grounds that (in these people's opinion - I'm not
taking a stand in this message) it amounts to official
segregation: Howard can never take on Georgetown or GWU in a
CBI tournament, and Florida A&M can't take on
Florida. This problem is exacerbated because of claims
that CBI gives HCASC easier questions because of
concerns about lack of ability (I'm not touching this one
either). The major problems are thus with the motive and
not necessarily with the decision itself. These are
serious allegations, and previous discussion on the
subject has become quite heated. CBI, unfortunately, has
never to my knowledge listed an official explanation of
the rationale for their policy.

The other
problem stems from the fact that HCASC schools must
compete in CBI-licensed tournaments,
which involve
paying a fee of $1 per team per tournament. If not,
their players get barred from HCASC.

If you're
new to this group, lots of quiz bowl players have
very deep grievances with CBI, particularly over its
claim that they own the standard tossup-bonus format
(hence the licensing fee). Paying this fee gives CBI
money and may strengthen a CBI legal claim should CBI
ever initiate a lawsuit.

Many are thus faced
with a Catch-22: affiliate and strengthen an
organization that they don't like, or not affiliate and thus
eliminate HCASC schools from the circuit.

Much of
the current postings deal with involving HCASC
schools in the quizbowl 'circuit' without jeopardizing
their eligibility.

Hayden
Hurst
hurstrh_at_...

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:42 AM EST EST