Re: TRASH not worthy???

I'll be quite specific in my reply to Phil
here.

My response to question considered what a university
would consider worth promoting. I sorta doubt that
Georgetown (or most other universities) would actively
promote success in TRASH on par with success in a more
"academic" format. It seems more difficult to justify it to
parents of prospective students when questions are posed
(you mean that you answer questions about sports and
the Brat Pack?).

I'll agree that TRASH's
changing canon makes success at it quite difficult, but I
can't see a university promoting it (especially at the
expense of CBI, NAQT, and/or ACF. My response therefore
focused on what a university would do if it had a choice.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:42 AM EST EST