Re: [quizbowl] Re: NAQT thoughts...

As a high school player myself, all I know is that NAQT is much cheaper, since its $175 for the whole team as compared
to up to $325 per person, and has twice the amount of matches. And, see, if I wanted to go on vacation, I'd go on a
vacation and not to a quiz bowl tounrament that would waste the valuable limited resources that we have.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris White" <cwhite2_at_...>
To: <quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: [quizbowl] Re: NAQT thoughts...


| --- In quizbowl_at_y..., ufilthycur <no_reply_at_y...> wrote:
|
| > As for responding to Chris's comments, I believe his comments
| > asserting that your average high school quizbowler would go for
| > location and crappy tournament over a well-run academic tournament
| > iare certainly more his opinion than actual fact.
|
| All I know is that *everyone* on my old team, and just about every HS
| team I knew (or my advisor old me about) would prefer the location,
| with the exception of a particular prep school in the area that
| apparently was too good even for NAQT.  I wouldn't be surprised if
| there was a cadre of  well-established, rich, HS teams that avoid Chip,
| but a middle-class public school like mine will, I'm convinced, always
| get seduced by the promise of an exciting vacation.   I'm just going by
| personal experience here, feel free to discount it if you wish.
|
|
|
|
| To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
| quizbowl-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com
|
|
|
| Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
|
|

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST