Vacuous and Trivial

Just to add to the whining ...

Vacuous has a pretty rigorous meaning in mathematics, and it derives 
from one way the conditional (implication, only if, etc.) can be 
true.  The conditional p -> q is true whenever p is false or q is 
true (false only when p is true and q is false).  In the case that p 
is false, we say that the conditional is *vacuously* true.  

One example in mathematics is the subset operator.  Given two 
arbitrary sets S and T, S is a subset of T if and only if every 
element of S is also an element of T.  Symbolically, we write (x)(x 
an element of S -> x an element of T).  Now, let 0 denote the empty 
set and A denote some arbitrary set.  Then 0 is a subset of A because 
it vacuously fulfills the requirements of the subset.  That is, there 
is no x such that x is an element of 0, so the antecedent of the 
conditional is false and the conditional itself is true.

Trivial gets one into much more trouble as it is bandied about more 
often and less technically in mathematical circles.  Sometimes it is 
taken to mean a result that is apparent or obvious.  Sometimes it 
also refers to the conditional in the case where a problem reduces to 
p -> p.  In abstract algebra, it is used to refer to a one element 
set, group, ring, etc.  As in, the subgroup {e} is the trivial 
subgroup of a group G, where e is the identity element.

Anyway, this probably *is* a bit more off the tack of the discussion, 
but oh well.

Trivially,
jlive

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST