Re: NAQT ICT, and BCS-like "Luck"

     My thanks to NAQT and UCLA for a good tournament.  We (UF) had
top-notch moderators (Hentzel, Bhan, Jennings, Hilleman, Waters, et
al) in nearly every match, things ran pretty much on
time, and the questions (I thought) were pretty good for the most
part.  I was glad to finally get a chance to take multiple shots at
the top 3 teams, even though all 5 of those matches were losses (2 to
Chicago, 2 to Michigan A, 1 to Berkeley A).  After watching the final,
I'm rather proud of our 500 or so total points while receiving our two
Subashings.

     As for the final four rounds in Div I ... whether or not it is a
better system than in previous years, I don't know.  The ladder play
system has its drawbacks.  As an example, two years ago, my FAU team
faced Florida (an exceedingly familiar opponent) 3 matches out of 4
late in the day, which was an unfortunate coincidence.  By contrast,
this year we entered the playoff rounds this year as the #5 team but
never faced #4, Michigan B.  I think the rankings thru 11 rounds were
probably a better reflection of the relative strengths of the teams
than were the rankings thru 15 rounds.  Maryland's 3rd place finish
(ahead of Michigan) was one oddity, and I think UF's 11th-place finish
was another.  We were never held under 200 points (for whatever that's
worth), and five of our seven losses were to the aforementioned three
strongest teams.  We exchanged ~300-point blowouts with Yale (their
win being in the playoffs, unfortunately for us), and a strong
Maryland team beat us 385-355 in the last playoff round (with a
combination of excellent playing, good clock strategy, and a little
help from my 3 stupid negs).  We had blowout wins over Harvard, UCLA,
Texas
A&M, and our other 4 opponents.  As such, I think 11th is a bit
artificially low, relative to the team's overall performance.  [[Of
course, it's entirely our own fault for slumping late in the day, or
for not slumping earlier in the tournament.]]

     Regardless of that stuff, I had fun, and I thought it was a good
tournament.  I'd swear there was more pop culture and CBI-ish stuff
late in the tournament, but I know it's probably my imagination.  And
of course it was an honor to watch Subash in action -- his performance
was the best I've ever seen by an individual at any tournament ever. 
My congratulations as well to Berkeley and Valencia CC on a
well-played Div II final.

--Raj Dhuwalia

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST