Re: ICT comments

--- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, jpahk <no_reply_at_y...> wrote:
> gee, i'm glad you all know finnish composers so well and have 
shared 
> that information with the rest of us. by and large, though, you 
seem 
> to have missed adam's point, which is that it sucks ass to write a 
> tossup specifically to un-exclusify a clue like "this finnish 
> composer." 

Agreed, completely, and I guess I should have stated that I agreed 
with the rest of Adam's post. It just irritates me a bit to see this 
point come at the expense of something like music from "other parts 
of the world" (read "canon expansion where it is needed"). I also 
agree that biographical questions should pop up less than actual 
knowledge about, among other things, music, literature, and 
_science_, although I don't see any reason to _completely_ ban these 
from packets either, as, while they may not reward what you learned 
in class (especially for science), they are viable, learnable 
knowledge (maybe restrict them to 1/1 or 0/1 or 1/0 per packet for 
science?) Main point: Finnish music, or music from any culture, 
should not be restricted to a single composer, or writer or painter 
for that matter. Science is, indeed, a different issue. Sorry for 
going that far off topic.

--Wesley (who will now be quiet for a while). 

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST