Re: Sportsmanship or Legal Strategy?

Doug O'Neal wrote:

"In football, I once saw a team up by one with not much time left and 
no timeouts let the other team score a touchdown, so they'd be down 
by 8 and have a chance to tie with their own touchdown + 2-point 
conversion.  As I recall, it worked."

The Green Bay Packers used this sort of strategy in Super Bowl 
XXXII.  The game was tied 24-24 late in the game, and the Denver 
Broncos had the ball deep in Green Bay territory.  With 1:45 left, 
Green Bay decided to let Denver score a touchdown so that the Packers 
could get the ball back with time on the clock and tie the game, 
sending it into overtime.  In this instance, the strategy did not 
work; Denver's defense stopped the Brett Favre-led Packers and John 
Elway won his first Super Bowl, 31-24.

Just proof that this strategy has been employed, indeed on the 
biggest stage in football.  In the quiz bowl case study, I have no 
beef with a team negging on purpose to end the game; the rules of 
that tournament (neg kills the question, but still have bonuses) were 
indeed ludicrous.  Like Panasonic, only worse, since there are also 
bonuses.  (In Panasonic, there would be no need to do this, since 
incorrect is same value as correct and there are no bonuses.)

--Josh, P. t. altaica

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST