either/or/both...actually I was thinking of Nats...I'm sure that far more teams would be put out over the regionals being on the same day...I have a hard time believing that there are more than a handful who go to both Nationals.... --- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, voiceofreason_quizbowl <no_reply_at_y...> wrote: > Are you suggesting that ACF Nationals be held the same day as CBI > Nationals? Or are you suggesting that ACF Regionals be held the > same day as CBI Regionals? Or are you suggesting both? > > > > --- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, thefool75 <no_reply_at_y...> wrote: > > Having a Nats on Easter weekend is troublesome due to increased > air- > > fares (many of the normally economical AirTran fares to Atlanta > were > > not available for this past weekend--it is likely that for many > teams > > it was cheaper to fly to the NAQT ICT then ACF Nats)...my question > is- > > -how many teams would really be bent out of shape if ACF occupied > the > > same weekend as CBI...I doubt ACF would even lose a team and no > doubt > > would tick off 2 or 3 players...but may very well make up for that > > with increased attendance from others... > > > > my 3 cents, nathan > > > > P.S. Why did Michigan B anticipate a Nats tournament ending at > 7:00 > > p.m...who schedules a flight out the night of a tournament? > That's > > just strange...they have no cause for complaint.... > > > > P.P.S. Although ensuring consistency in bonus difficult is a > > legitimate concern (as is attempting to keep packets relatively > close > > in overall difficulty)...you don't understand the point of ACF if > you > > think that having an obscure tossup followed by a hyper- accessible > > one is somehow intrinsically flawed...there is nothing wrong with > > having a tossup on Svevo followed by one on Shakespeare so long as > > they are both pyramidal in structure....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST