Thoughts on current themes

Some disturbing themes have been running through 
recent threads. I wanted to take a minute as a 
member of the community to make some points no one 
else seems to be making in the name of common sense. 
If you agree with them, speak up. You have as much 
right to be here as the loudmouths.

1.)    There is no "correct order of finish" for a 
tournament. If there were, we could just mail the 
trophies to the teams and save everyone the airfare 
and hotel costs. We play the games because the 
unexpected happens. If the breaks don't go your 
way one weekend, it's not because you were screwed 
by the tournament director, screwed by the format, 
or screwed by the bracketing. Shut up and do better 
next time. Otherwise, you look like an idiot or a 
sore loser, or both.

2.)    No one manner of acquisition of knowledge 
is "better" or "more legitimate" than others.  If 
you know a clue about a Pulitzer Prize winning 
novel because of its reference on Friends, it's 
not any less legit than if you read seven critical 
essays about the work.  As long as I buzz in correctly 
before you, well, that's all that matters.  Deal 
with it, you got beat.

3.)    When you run a tournament, keep your customers 
informed as to what's going on. That's just common 
courtesy, and it's why you're there. Players will 
be less likely to bitch on the Yahoo board if they 
know there's a good reason they're waiting around.

4.)    The elite players and ACF fundamentalists do 
not hold the monopoly on "correct opinions" as to 
what makes quiz bowl fun or fair. I daresay most 
people here couldn't care less about Italo Spazo 
or whoever the hell you guys were talking about 
last week. If you don't like what's being said, 
speak up, even if you don't get 50 PPG or play 
for Maryland or Chicago. If you let the tyrannical 
minority who seem to do most of the posting here 
shout you down, expect to see a lot more questions 
on art historians of the fifteenth century or some 
other irrelevant bullshit. Most of us have sat back 
and let these dickwads go unchallenged because it's 
just not worth it to mess with them. This is the 
result.

5.)    Instead of ripping tournaments into shreds 
in public because you'll look cool, why not -- 
concept! -- make some critiques in private? Not 
everyone needs to hear your latest theory about 
how a tournament was unfair or why Swiss pairs 
are God or why the Penn Bowl question sucked or 
anything else. Figure out who can fix things 
next year. Tell them, politely, what you'd like 
fixed. Lather, rinse, repeat. No one sets out to 
run a bad tournament. Accusing them of doing that 
makes you look like an ignorant chumpmonkey.

Thank you for your time.
A Voice of the Silent Majority

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST