Re: NATSSO feedback

When I wrote the praise, I ahd forgotten about that packet.  It was 
pretty bad.  Most of the questions in that packet were answered 
extremely fast, so I didn't realize until looking that many lacked 
the "FTP" and many were incredibly short.  

However, I don't think that one packet justifies bashing a 
tournament... It was still enjoyable and an overall good 
tournament.  Granted, that packet did need some serious work.


-Lee

--- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, "darwins_bulldog1138" 
<darwins_bulldog1138_at_y...> wrote:
> I didn't go to that tournament, but I have seen several packets 
from
> it since it occurred. Was that "GT alums packet" a joke or 
something?
> Two-line tossups, a frequent lack of pronouns or specific clues,
> tossups on things like "animal crackers," and to top it off, not a
> single "FTP" to be found, even in the edited version. I can't 
stomach
> how anyone could praise the questions from a tournament that 
included
> that packet.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST