Leave it to this poster child of pro-choice supporters to ad homie me on a West Coast D2 controversy. Also, nobody at Wichita State said anything about being an exhibition team. I'm going to be very motivated for CBI Regionals. You have been warned. Jason Mueller Who is quite fed up with allythin's anorexic comments and is ready to flame back. --- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, allythin <no_reply_at_y...> wrote: > > > The second more meaningful issue is that teams are understably a > bit > > miffed over what happened but it is certainly no fault of UCLA's > that > > they finished how they did - I wouldn't have told the UCLA D2 team > > last year something along the lines of "hey because you're an > > exhibition team can ya kinda just, oh I dunno, not play well?" > > OK let's try this on for size. When Witchita State ran an > exhibition team last year in D2 at SCT (and despite what Mueller > tells you what he thinks happened with this is just WRONG), they > were listed on the NAQT site as having their wins not count because > of the ineligible player and the individual stats were expunged. > Now BY DEFINITION, the point of being an "exhibition" is that the > wins and losses count for squat. The individual stats would then > too. But NAQT awarded Meigs a scoring title, as a result of his > COMPETITIVE performance. His and UCLA's stats are also listed on > the NAQT site > > http://naqt.com/Results/2003-ict-divii-results.html > > So, basically NAQT (conciously or not) broke with how it treated > Witchita and basically (intentionally or not) misrepresented to > everyone what that UCLA team was. > > Course this is what we get for insisting on coddling newbies for a > year by even having D2 to begin with. But that's a separate thread. > > Sean Phillips > talking for himself, the crazy homeless lady on my street with a > killer mullet, and the mouse living in my stove.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST