In defense of Georgia

Well, I checked this thing tonight to see if there was an update on 
an upcoming tournament, and I see that the ole alma mater has come 
under attack.  So, confoundit, I guess I have to post. 

Prior to graduating last year, I captained UGA as and undergraduate 
and in law school, so I know what I'm talking about.  That said, 
Matt Weiner does not.  Georgia in no way refuses to attend academic 
tournaments.  In fact, this year Georgia hosted two NAQT events, and 
attended NAQT nationals in Division II, posting a respectable 
record.  The players in the program are young and talented.  The 
only graduate student is Robin, the current captain.

True, as a program, Georgia has largely shied away from ACF 
tournaments.  John Skelton, who preceeded me as captain, did not 
like the ACF format and warned me I wouldn't either.  Regardless, we 
attended some ACF events early on.  We did not care for them.  I 
didn't see the value of staring at a wall while five questions went 
unanswered, nor did I have the inclination to commit to memory the 
esoteric knowledge about which was being asked.  In short, I had no 
fun.  I've always felt if you have the option to do something, why 
do it, if you don't enjoy it?  Now, I don't mean to attack the ACF 
format here.  Obviously some people do enjoy it, and that's great.  
I don't go to the tournaments, but I don't attack people for hosting 
them or enjoying them either.  We did have people at Georgia who 
enjoyed the format, and played it--even winning a tournament or 
two.  

I will say that I think knowing the material that is more often 
asked in the other formats, especially trash, has served me better 
generally.  I find I can build rapport with someone much easier 
using knowledge from the trash realm than from ACF.  But to argue 
one format's validity over the other really is silly.  When you get 
down to it, what value do any of them have in bettering a person, 
other than teamwork, which is shared by all?  They all simply 
involve recall of knowledge--the lowest level of Bloom's taxonomy.  
Really, all that's left is the entertainment value, so if you enjoy 
what you're playing, your format is serving its purpose. 

Back to Matt Weiner, after seeing your post tonight, I remembered 
that a friend from a rival institution told me a few weeks ago that 
someone named Matt Weiner had posted on a high school board that the 
Georgia program had been destroyed by trash.  I searched to make 
sure.  Sure enough, I found the post.  That post was inaccurate and 
irresponsible.  The Georgia team is well-rounded and successful.  In 
addition to the evidence above, the team finished second in college 
bowl regionals.  They also had a player make the top scorers' list 
at NAQT nationals.  I've been told that their modified ACF 
participation was limited this year because of scheduling conflicts 
the younger players had.  As far as trash participation, the 
philosophy, in addition to above, is and has been that it provides 
balance.  So the team has hosted TRASH regionals in the past, hosted 
an independent trash tournament this year, and has attended trash 
tournaments regularly in the past.  As far as trash attendance this 
year by Georgia, that has been almost exclusively by Georgia 
alumni.  Make no mistake, the Georgia program is vibrant...far from 
destroyed.  As someone who had such a vested interest in the program 
for a good while, I just had to set the record straight. 

Mark Franklin

P.S.  Regarding Robin's tournament post: Sounds interesting to me--
hope people can make it.   


--- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, "Matt Weiner" 
<darwins_bulldog1138_at_y...> wrote:
> Turning away freshmen interested in academic quizbowl because your 
team
> refuses to attend academic events is not a great way 
to "contribute to the
> quizbowl community." I did seriously want an answer to the 
question despite
> the insistence of certain people on making all discussions about 
me. To
> rephrase, is there any reason a regular academic tournament could 
not be
> held in place of this mixed-format idea which has repeatedly 
failed in the
> past?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:47 AM EST EST