After reading through the aforesaid UCI packet there are of course
plenty of criticisms that could be made question by question
(although two or three tossups were fine) but it's not really any
worse than your average un-edited poorly written packet. But a quick
note on the "Hrotswitha" tossup that Willie's proud of. First, she's
already in the canon -- there have been at least two ACF bonus parts
on her. Second, she's too obscure for a tossup (except for perhaps a
very hard-core Master's tourney)...the difference between Hrotswitha
and say Hildegard of Bingen in terms of obscurity should be obvious.
As has been said before, canon expansion is best done through bonus
parts (except that in this case it wouldn't be canon expansion
anyway). Third, the question wasn't pyramidal anyway -- if you're
going to get the tossup, you're going to get it off of the mention of
her six Terentian comedies in the 2nd line of the tossup -- that's
the giveaway -- so the rest of the question is pointless anyway.
my 3 cents, Nathan