Re: Ghetto Warz (and question-writing in general)

--- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, "Matt Weiner" 
<darwins_bulldog1138_at_y...> wrote:
> > Well, except that now Hroswitha's got publicity, so you might as 
well
> > write all the questions you want.
> 
> Giving out points based on reading the message board seems horribly 
unfair.

Do I need to point out when I'm being facetious?  I would have 
thought the tone and content would have accomplished that well 
enough.  I'm not going to resort to smiley faces here.

> Likewise, the "people have been answering Hildegard forever, they 
should
> expect the canon to expand towards more obscure medieval female 
authors"
> justification...it's incestuous and prohibitive to new players. 
Tossups need
> to be accessible to the whole field, not just "people who get their
> knowledge from old packets."

Yes... if someone were saying that, it would be.  If someone were 
confusing that with the considerably more rational "multiple quiz 
bowl players know Hildegard; in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, it should be assumed that multiple players will know 
Hroswitha, a similar figure of roughly equal importance".  
Really, "why do people not know Hroswitha?" is only half the 
question -- the other half is, "why do those same people know 
Hildegarde"?  

The easy answer: "Because Hildegard has a more accessible giveaway 
clue -- 'FTP, etc. etc. from Bingen'."  Which is an inherent flaw in 
the structure of the game, and not one (I think) it's possible to 
change.  

The other, more problematic answer: "Because somebody decided to put 
Hildegard into a packet ten years ago, and she has been kicking 
around the scene ever since, and I guess people know her now."  And 
really, what can be done about this either?  She's there now.  
Hroswitha isn't.  It's impossible to write questions on Hroswitha 
because they're not going to be answered; it's silly to say, "don't 
write any more questions on Hildegard, because other medieval authors 
aren't getting represented."  And I'm all for any reasonable proposal 
to stop the <i>de facto</i> canon from getting skewed in this 
fashion, but as far as I know, there's no really plausible way in 
advance, let alone in retrospect like this one.

So, I suppose that, for better or worse, that's the balance.  Keep 
asking Hildegard, stop asking Hroswitha.  And yeah, this skewing is 
part of the game too... but that doesn't mean it isn't going to seem 
a bit off.  

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:48 AM EST EST