Re: Northeast Sectionals (2/2)

(cont'd from previous post...)


* Also,
the issue of a B team, while an interesting point, is
mostly irrelevant to our case: if we could have been
guaranteed even one bid in -each- division, we wouldn't have
fielded any teams. It was the fact that we would have to
sacrifice one division as a penalty for hosting the
tournament which proved the main problem. (I know that
solutions to this are being discussed, so I don't want to
beat the issue to death, but I felt this was worth
mentioning again.)

* Finally, Dom worries that our B
team will be composed of "obviously inferior" players.
While it probably won't have Joon, David, or Willy
(though it probably will have Gautam), it -will- have 4
(or possibly 5) players. This goes back to what I was
saying at the beginning: if we had been able to put 12
people into our teams, I have no doubt we would have
achieved roughly the same results. But our teams were
shorthanded, so we had to put our best players on them to
compensate. I think these effects cancel out.

Anyway.
I know the NE SCT wasn't perfect, and I apologize
for the tradeoffs which were necessary, but I tried
my hardest to balance the needs of the tournament
with our own needs, which I think resulted in the
fairest possible result.

Thanks for
listening,
Paul

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:42 AM EST EST