Re: FAMU wins HCASC!

>>By the way, HCASC has a far greater percentage of NON-Black coaches
and players than the "Circuit's" percentage of Black coaches and
players. That's segregation???  Please...  I really wish folks would
stop commenting on "poor old HCASC" as though it NEEDS the help of
other programs to justify itself.  It doesn't... THE STUDENTS ENJOY
THE EXPERIENCE!  And those that want more, seek it at their leisure. 
What's the problem?<<

The problem is that the effects of the mandatory segregation do
linger. The fact that CBI chose, in 1999, to catch up with three
decades of American society and stop outright banning HBCUs from
participating in regular quizbowl means two things even after the lift
of the ban:
1) They are the type of people who would institute such a ban, and
thus highly ethically suspect.
2) The effect of years of outright lies and other propoganda about
regular quizbowl lingers. Let's take another racial issue. We're all
aware that the effects of slavery didn't magically dissapear in 1865;
the generational impact of denied education et cetera is the major
argument behind the slavery-reparations movement. Similarly, on a much
smaller scale, the effects of years and years without exposure to
regular quizbowl have damaged the institutional experience of HCASC
teams and put them 10 years behind mainstream programs in certain
competitive resources (packet archives, experience with the canon, et
cetera) through no fault of the current players, but through every
fault of CBI.

You assert that there are not enough black players at mainstream
circuit events. Yet you also yourself stated that you were TOTALLY
UNAWARE OF the circuit while you were playing HCASC. So how the hell
would you know anything about the racial makeup of the circuit? The
obvious answer is that you don't have any firsthand information on
this, and simply accepted a line from CBI about horrific racial
oppression over in regular quizbowl. This brings up a multitude of new
problems:
1) CBI, which likewise has no experience on the regular circuit, is
making statements about it to a captive audience whom CBI had
prohibited from finding out the truth on their own
2) These statements are of dubious factual accuracy and are extremely
self-serving to CBI, and revolve around the inflammatory issue of
racial discrimination
3) You are getting all your information from one of the parties in the
conflict, then repeating it as fact

Furthermore, you are committing a host of errors by assuming that the
rosaparks posts are the entirety of the anti-HCASC argument.
1) Even if the segregation never occurred, we still wouldn't like
HCASC or any other event played on CBI questions, which are terrible
questions that do not reward knowledge and in fact intentionally
punish it. Any sort of separate tournament set up by CBI in an attempt
to further divide the circuit and make more money by foisting these
crap questions on people is unnacceptable, whether it be a tournament
just for HBCUs, just for Ivy League schools, just for undergraduates,
whatever. 
2) CBI's patronizing attitude towards non-majority culture of all
kinds is evident in their questions. The 2005 NCT set is apparently
wholly unaware that literature and history occurred in places other
than the United States. The way they address female and
African-American contributions to the US is through tokenism: lots of
questions on "the first black guy to do this" and "the first woman to
do that" which seem drawn out of a second-grade Black History Month
curriculum, no questions on the higher accomplishments of those
groups. I've heard lots of questions requiring real knowledge of
Claude McKay's novels or the Denmark Vesey revolt in ACF and NAQT,
none at CBI, just more "first black woman to climb Mount Aconcagua"
type inanity. BLACK PLAYERS ON THE CIRCUIT HAVE COMPLAINED ABOUT THIS.
Yes, they do exist, and they dislike CBI too!

By the way, I was playing Princeton on the Andrew Young tossup at ICT,
and they won a buzzer race to get the tossup. I didn't notice any
"rosaparks" in the tournament stats, so maybe people who actually did
attend the tournament know more about important black history topics
than you give them credit for.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:48 AM EST EST