Format proposal

First, a caveat: after I left the chatroom
earlier for late dinner and English homework, I began to
feel cooped up in my apartment. So I stepped out to do
the English homework elsewhere. As a result, I have
now assimilated a few John Donne works and am also
drunk. Let me remind the forum that I do not speak ex
cathedra on this matter.

Iron
Quizbowl.

Those of you who know Tricia Southard know that she's
an Iron Chef fanatic and also plays for Furman.
Probably it's some amalgam of these that led to this path
of reasoning. But here's the basic idea:

At
some trash tournament or other, an organization with
one player each specializing in the Big Five trash
categories -- sports, movies, music, TV, geek (or however
you want to count them) issues a challenge. Some
third party prepares a theme packet of unknown theme --
TRASHionals would be a nice place to testbed this, but that's
a few months away. A challenger -- say, the player
with the highest PPG at the tournament -- approaches
the podium. The theme of the packet is revealed (dare
y'all to write a packet on Giant White Asparagus!). The
challenger chooses his opponent -- Iron Quizbowler Sports,
say. Or something. I remind you, I'm drunk and
"reasonable" means something different to me. They play a
high-stakes battle on the packet. Here's the kicker -- the
points scored only count for half the total score. There
are four judges. They rate the way the Iron
Quizbowler and the challenger played, and add their assigned
scores to the totals. And the winner lives on in eternal
glory.

I think it would be neat if, say, the Gerbils were
to run a trash tournament this way. I think that,
for a large enough organization (or one with a big
enough specialist base) it would be a neat way to run a
singles tournament.

I'll mull it over again in the
morning but I think there's something to be found
here.

Also, since I said it first, I dibs the Chairman Kaga
role.

Edmund

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST