Re: Tournaments at 2 (Re: CP2 Review)

Why? I would love to be able to sleep late
instead of getting up at 7:30 or earlier for a tournament
(and I'm sure I'm not the only one). It promotes a
relaxed environment and may lead to better efficiency as
the director may be better-rested and more alert. A
tournament shouldn't be held simply to finish on time
anyway. That should be a positive and logical consequence
of a good tournament. What difference does it make
if it runs late anyway? Ask yourself, "Is my time
really that precious that I need to give a
damn?"

Jason, must respectfully disagree with you here. A
tournament that starts in the afternoon will run into the
late evening at best, if it runs on time, which
invariably, 75% or more of tournaments seem not to. Couple
this with the distance that a significant number of
teams/people drive to partake in these events, and it is a
much better idea to have a morning start that allows
for an early evening departure than it is to push
back the start, which pushes back the finish, which
pushes back the departure. For many of us, our time is
that valuable, we have to get back for classes, to
work on projects, or in some frightening cases, real
life. A tournament should run on time because it serves
the customer better. One should give a damn about a
tournament running on time because either you want to serve
your customer to the best of your abilities and have
them realize that you consider their time to be
important or because you feel that as a customer, the
provider of the service, in this case the tournament,
should have a feel for the logisitcal constraints of
running said tournament.

CDB

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST