Re: Ka-ons and revoting

Two points.

First, while I commend Seth
for his honesty, I don't believe for a minute that
either Gore or Bush would stop from condoning fraud to
win, let alone let an honest mistake
slide.

Second, here's an interesting clip from the platform of
the political party to which I
belong.

>>The Australian ballot system, introduced into the
United States in the late nineteenth century, is an
abridgement of freedom of expression and of voting rights.
Under it, the names of all the officially approved
candidates are printed in a single government sponsored
format and the voter indicates his or her choice by
marking it or by writing in an approved but unlisted
candidate's name. We should return to the previous electoral
system where there was no official ballot or candidate
approval at all, and therefore no state or federal
restriction of access to a "single ballot." Instead, voters
submitted their own choices and had the option of using
"tickets" or cards printed by candidates or political
parties.
<<

How about that? There's no role for ballot designers
to influence the process, and people won't be able
to vote uninformed. There could be special
arrangements for disabled or illiterate voters, of course.
Does anyone else think that this might be
helpful?

--M.W.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST