Re: NAQT Mid-At and Standing Tiebreaks I

I'm not quite sure what's up with the standings
UVA posted for NAQT Division II, but as far as I know
there was not actually a 4-way tie for 1st. Based on
the scores our team (UNC) was taking during matches
and those announced at match end (both of which all
turned out the same), UNC's record should have been
12-1, with our only loss coming to Maryland C (190-165
in Round 4 or 5 if you care). This would obviously
put us well in first and leave a 3-way tie for
second. 

If something happened otherwise with
score reporting and such, then I was never informed of
it. I would also really like to know who it was
reported that we lost to besides Maryland. 

Grayson
Holmes
Carolina Academic Team President

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST