Re: Plagiarism, etc...

<<I think suing would be pretty ineffectual
because you've got dozens and dozens of potential
plaintiffs.>>

Class-actionable baby!!!

<<And something tells me
that Mr. Beall isn't independently wealthy by any
means.>>

What is the goal of the class-action suit? To put him
out of business? To get him to stop plagiarising the
archive? 

<<Maybe a better solution would be
to find a high school team that's never done well at
Chip's tournaments and tip them off to the existence of
the question archive.>>

Only problem is
that Chip uses the archive as one of many sources. I
am sure that Chip writes 70-80% of his Q's from
various sources such as the Cambridge Encyclopaedia
(sorry Rob :), and the such. I know I do ;) 

So
at the most Chip gets 5-10% of his Qs from the
archive. Also the teams going would need to memorise the
entire archive which is also a daunting
task.

<<A few nasty upset wins might be all that's
necessary to stop Chip from plagiarizing the
archive.>>

see above.

<<Why not make the archive
free, but password protected? Whoever owns it...I don't
know if this would be feasible, but you could say on
the front page, "Because of recent issues of
plagiarizing for the profit of other entities, we have decided
to password-protect the Stanford archive. You can
get the password by registering your name and, if
applicable, team with whoever...and then when Mr. Beall
writes, politely inform him that he's the reason the
archive isn't being mage public. I don't know if that'd
work at all, but...>>

the chipster has
either (1) got the q's on his harddrive (i know i did b4
my hard disk crash of 1999) or (2) will get someone
to go in by proxy if he wants to badly enough.


--shawn

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST