Re: Winning versus scoring

<<Also, if NAQT had given out the secret
formula, SCT hosts could have used it to compute rankings
of the participating teams.>>

Actually,
our rankings can't be computed until all results from
all sectionals are in hand, due to the importance of
the calculation of each team's strength of schedule,
which involves a comparison of the average statistics
of each team's actual collective opponents over the
course of their tournament with the statistics of the
overall average statistics for all teams from the same
division playing on the same questions in all tournaments.
You need all of the results before you can compute
the exact percentage by which a given team's actual
schedule was statistically harder or easier than the
national average, and you can't complete our formula
without knowing that.

<<Thirdly, if players
know the secret formula, then they can use it to form
strategies to optimize their chances of getting an ICT
invitation.>>

I've described the thing enough last year and this
that the strategies are clear enough: score as many
points as possible in all of your matches, and also
(though admittedly less crucial until now unless an
automatic invitation via a title is at stake) win as many
as possible. (And if a tournament format eventually
breaks into upper and lower divisions for further games,
get into the higher one, even if you'd score more
points and win more games in the lower, because we
_have_ made it a rule for this particular case that
teams from lower divisions cannot be invited ahead of
teams from upper ones in the same
tournament.)

ESH

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST