Re: signing your posts

1. I can see objections about signing names due
to concerns about search engines checking for
entered comments. I'd find it more appropriate for sites
other than this (a member of a company fearing
retaliation), but there are legitimate reasons.

If you
want to get into really unfun reasons, a stalker,
knowing that someone participated in quizbowl, could find
a name and cross-reference it with a university -
email and web site searches can be very good, and
opting out to make the revealing of personal information
harder should be a legitimate choice. It's remote, but
it's a possibility that should not be
discounted.

2. There's something to be said about impressions.
I've posted enough to this forum to influence people's
opinions of what I write. Anonymity allows those opinions
to be wiped clean and for points that might
otherwise be pushed away to be made.

The caveat to
this is that I feel that most people won't take
posts/flames from an unknown account as seriously as posts
from a known (or signed) one. As this is an open
forum, people also might post without knowing "the
rules" - should their posts be cleared?

I'l agree
that anonymity allows people to write their flame
graffiti without fear of reprisal, and that it's annoying.
But anonymity has its place.

Hayden Hurst

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:44 AM EST EST