There is of course a largeish difference between
someone forming a group to create discussion on a
subtopic of *one's own* interest, and creating a group
simply to remove and separate topics one has no stake in
(and isn't particularly fond of). The reason given for
qbtrash's creation was poor, mentioning a problem that may
or may not exist and which could be addressed by
less controversial means.
So, okay, would
qbtrash's existence have my shorts in such a bunch if
created by, say, a Barker or a Dinan? Probably not, but
it would still be unnecessary, IMO.
--Greg