Anthony deJesus wrote: "Any military action which overthrows the Taliban (or Saddam Hussein) should have an eye towards reconstructing the country, with an eye towards the political psychology of the region." Anthony, this is a good point -- I like the idea of possibly reconstructing these countries after the antagonistic regimes are overthrown. There is one main question I have though, which I cannot answer: Will these nations accept reconstructive aid, given that many of them come from a different cultural viewpoint toward economics? Germany and Japan both had developed or highly developing capitalistic economies in the years leading up to World War II. A focus on rebuilding and boosting economics and technology in these nations was not much of a stretch for them in the late 1940s. Do the nations in the Middle East care greatly about developing a strong economy, or do theological issues mean more? Obviously I would think they would accept humanitarian aid to feed and clothe citizens, but above that would post-World War II issues of growth matter to them? If Middle Eastern nations want to boost themselves into economic powers, great. But if not, then how will (political/social) reconstruction work? I am interested to hear ideas. Oh, and sorry Ms. Moore, but this issue will linger on in our lives for quite some time... but if you really want to hear my thoughts on FAQTP and biographical questions, I will be happy to oblige. -Adam Fine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:44 AM EST EST