Jason Weill:
<<"To resolve this
situation, we went to comparative won-loss records: here,
Kentucky and Pitt were tied atop the
standings.">>
Arthur:
<<Just out of curiosity, what do you mean by
"comparative won-loss records"? Is this another name for
card-matching? (I tried clicking on the link, but the server
wouldn't respond.)>>
No; it was a Circle
o'Death at 9-1, so card matching would be
useless.
Moreover, going by points scored in matches among the teams
tied, Kentucky finished at +30, and Pitt and Michigan
were tied at -15 each. So I, too, would like to know
how Kentucky and Pitt ended up "tied" with Michigan
behind them....
--STI