Re: ACF Fall commentary

Roger wrote:

"I would like to congratulate
Kelly McKenzie on a job well done in editing the
inaugural ACF Fall Tournament."

While Roger wrote
regarding question accessibility (and I do think the
questions were more accessible than what packs I've seen in
the past), from a moderating standpoint they were not
so hot. Three problems stand out:

1. NO
PRONUNCIATION GUIDES AT ALL. Please, don't leave us moderators
hanging like this! At least provide help for words not in
English. CBI extremes aren't necessary, but as someone
who's never been very good at pronouncing Chinese, for
example, I could some guidance.

2. Dodgy
formatting. No real standard for setting off titles in the
questions, making it hard at times to tell where one work
started and another began. Then th!ere were the rand!om
exclama!tion points! that would keep sho!wing up in
q!uestions.

3. Bonuses without point values, point values that
didn't add to 30, didn't have all the answers, or had
lead ins like "FTPE, heart stuff." And it's not like
this happened once or twice over the entire
day.

I also didn't care for the 8-9 line TUs that
cropped up (on occasion, not regularly), but that's just
my stylistic preference.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST