Re: ACF Fall commentary

<<"FTPE, heart stuff."

Hmmm, I know
what the bonus will be about, I didn't have to endless
lines of blather... this is exactly what lead-ins ought
to be! (unless the question is tricky enough to
require more setting up of course) I'd actually like to
see more of these leadins, especially at
packet-submission timed tournaments (that's PennBowl people) so we
can get through more than 18 damn tossups a round.
Anyone else a fan of/despise mimimized
leadins?>>

There was a time when, rather than say "Answer these
related Qs, 10 points each," I actually started some boni
with no lead-ins at all. But I stopped doing that when
people started complaining to me about it.

Right
now, though, I try to have a lead-in that cuts to the
point as quickly as possible, and provides helpful
information whenever possible. [For example, if all three
parts dealt with structures in the heart, I'd rather
say, "Name these structures in the (human) heart, 10
points each." Or, if the question dealt with the
differences in circulatory systems between humans and
insects, "Humans and insects have radically different
circulatory systems. 15 points each." And so
forth.]

In any case, it was true for PB10--and I expect it
to hold true for PB11--that the vast majority of
bonus lead-ins will be one line long or
less.

--STI

[Minor point: no more than 10% of the matches at PB10
got through fewer than 20 TUs, and, in many of those,
almost every TU was answered.]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST