I would also like to chime in and say how much I enjoyed the questions. I think the crowning achievement of this set was the total lack of factual errors. For most tournaments, hard editing work will eliminate all but a handful of potential hoses, and we accept that editors are human if the mistakes are kept to a bare minimum. Unless I'm recalling something wrong, this tournament was COMPLETELY factually accurate, hitting a crucially important goal of editing on the nose. Also, except for perhaps one or two incidents, there were no vague or misleading clues of any kind. Essentially, this tournament was a model for question style, my only complaint on that front being the length of bonus parts. I understand the value in writing "Name this author of A Moveable Feast and The Sun Also Rises" rather than "Name this author of The Sun Also Rises" in a gimme first part of the bonus, that value being that people who know the easy clue will learn something new, but perhaps it wasn't necessary to include six or seven such pieces of information in each bonus part. Finally, this set was amazingly accessible. Excepting one juniorbird played on NAQT IS questions, this was the easiest real tournament I've ever been to, yet I still think the games between top teams turned out fairly. That's a hard balance to pull off, and it was done well by both the submitting writers and Kelly's editing. Some people will complain about any tournament they don't do well at, and will take advantage of whatever negative stereotypes are floating around about ACF, NAQT, or whatever label the tournament had to back up their own logical fallacies. These people are wrong and should be ignored. Specifically regarding this set, anyone who thinks the difficulty level was too high really needs to reconsider his methods of acquiring academic information, because 90% of the ends of tossups and first bonus parts were answerable with a decent high school education, and that's as it should be. Accentuating the positive, --M.W.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST