Yadda yadda.... <<Why has no one looked at comparative bonus scores?>> Partly because there isn't enough information available for us to do so. If complete stats were posted for all the tournaments (especially the tournaments at Scripps), maybe that might shed a bit more light. <<If Cam was guilty, what reason would he have for telling the truth for a second in his message? Doesn't accepting what he has to say at face value imply that you've already decided he's innocent?>> Funny thing, that: in this country, people accused of crimes are generally presumed innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. At the moment, all the evidence is circumstantial. As I've said in private, I have no way of knowing exactly what happened. I know what I'd like to see happen in this particular case, but, seeing as I don't have a _vested_ interest in the matter(*), I won't discuss that here. I will say this, though: I have never met Cam. I don't know if I ever will. But I can say with some certainty that, until I see evidence contradicting his claims, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. But that raises one question: why are you so convinced he must be guilty? --STI (*)In other words, if any misdeeds did take place, I was not _directly_ affected by them (e.g., my team didn't lose any matches, etc.). Clearly, though, having someone actively cheating in a systematic manner would be a terrible thing that shouldn't be tolerated.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST