Re: Linked Qs

<<There is no evidence for
aesthetics.>>

I realize, in retrospect, I should have said
"reasoning" rather than "evidence."

<<However
what is your purpose with a bonus? To reward someone
for knowledge. What better way to reward them with an
opportunity to answer more questions that something they have
demonstrated via the tossup that they already know something
about, rather than something they may know nothing
about.>>

In such a situation, though, imagine a team that has
little to no knowledge of sports. They just happen to
get lucky on a sports TU--and are then effectively
screwed on the bonus.

<<Bonuses lack the
same type of structure, they just sit there, out of
context, with no relation to the
tossup.>>

Linking them to the TUs does not give a structure to
boni.

<<As I noted, whether a tossup on the 30-years war
should beget a bonus on that war, or on European
History, or on History in general is debateable. I see no
reason why it should generate a biology bonus
however.>>

On the flip side, I can't see any reason why it
_shouldn't_.

Basically, what I'm saying is that, IMO, God didn't intend
for boni to be linked *or* unlinked. If other
tournaments want to try it, fine.

--STI

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST