Re: Diagnostic test

The responses to the original post and the Wired
article both bothered me. The reason why is remarkably
difficult to express. I'll try anyway.

1. The only
context Wired gave was that a significant number of
members of an autistic group scored above 32, vice 16.4
for the general population. I couldn't find any
information on the original article that stated in what
context the "quiz" was used.

2. There does not
appear to be an indication that this is anything more
than a "ranking" of whether or not someone prefers
routines and is remarkably good at creating new ones or
not. Letter-perfect bureaucrats (or, as Wired says,
software programmers) would score remarkably high on this.
I'd doubt that all bureaucrats or software
programmers are autistic, though autistics may be attracted
to such fields (A does not lead to B, though B may
lead to A).

3. There are primarily two types of
questions - ability to create "order" out of "chaos" and
adaptability to unpredictable situations, with
ability/preference for order and lack of adaptability both leading
to a higher score. My problem is that diplomats who
are remarkably adept at names and faces will score
approximately the same as chaotic social recluses, and both
will score as high as the general population. I find
this unsettling for some reason.

4. Numerous
people's comments about scores changing over time seem
accurate and further troubling to anyone who wants to link
high scores to autism. A child would probably score
very poorly on adaptability questions - does this mean
that all children are autistic?

In sum, I think
that the test may have its place in autistic
diagnosis, but I think that people (and Wired) may be
reading too much into it when they consider it a
spectrum. I think that it's a good indication that
autistics tend to prefer routines and little
more.

Hayden
Who does fine at parties except when people tell him
he looks like the youngest guy in the Pentagon, that
he's younger than he sounds on the phone, or that he
shouldn't be old enough to need to shave :-P

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST