Re: Plagarism and Question Sources

Byko2000 wrote:
The big thing with Chip is
that year after year, he seems to find new teams out
of nowhere that most of the rest of us have never
heard of. It's even more amazing when these teams do
incredibly well and sometimes beat some of the most
well-known national powers.

This may be one reason
that the NAC is useful-- it lets teams that otherwise
would not get the chance to do so compete against other
teams from different part of the country. Teams from
Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota and the Virgin Islands
may have local formats, but the only time I know of
Billings-Skyview High School competing against teams from anywhere
else was in Beall's tournament. I think as the NAQT
high school circuit grows, the NAC will have a lot
more to worry about. We might do a better job
encouraging teams from the extremes, western mountains or
deserts to attend national tournaments run by NAQT or
another "mainstream" quizbowl source that runs
tournaments-- right now, Chip (granted, if you're good enough,
Panasonic) has been most successful at this. Having
experienced something like an NAQT tournament, I don't think
many new teams would want to return to the NAC. An
imagined prestige may be the reason why some do so,
somewhat similar to why College Bowl is so appealing to
trustees. Seeing no other alternative in 1997, my team
(Altamont, AL) certainly thought this way. Not caring about
plagiarized questions doesn't work for me.

--Wesley
(still wondering what happened to Grand Junction two
years ago)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST