Re: Beall's plan

Stan,

Well, there's cheap publicity and
unwanted publicity. I don't think QU needs any cheap
publicity; they apparently mail info every year to every
high school in the country.

Demonstrations of
alleged plagiarism would be unwanted publicity in my
opinion. Stories of how teams are aggrieved and don't go
to this competitions because he plays favorites and
writes bad questions aren't reasons for me to want to go
to his tournaments. Maybe getting hosed is good
reason for other teams since to them "that's the way the
game is." I don't know.

In the rest of the
world, academic dishonesty has resulted in sanctions,
outright dismissal, and even the loss of a prized football
coaching position. :) I don't think George O'Leary (or
anyone else at Notre Dame or Georgia Tech) would have
welcomed the news that O'Leary's resume contained false
information, as a reason for recruits or non-athletes to
attend their schools.

Heck, if you wanted cheap
publicity, he could get a news reporter, even an internet
reporter, to go to his comp and laud praises over it. Such
was the case with an ihigh.com report, with a student
correspondent from Dunbar (KY) when giving a view of the
Panasonic competition last year.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST