This recent thread.

diarrheamadman69 had this to say:

>>
I am no saint, and in fact love
well-crafted
>> homophobic, sexist and/or racist jokes
personally----
>> but I would never EVER post one that just
went
>> on and on as an invitation to a serious
event.

And on this note, *I* (who usually remain silent)
declare this a dead debate. With all due respect, I'm
left wondering how anyone who appreciates
"well-crafted" homophobic/racist/sexist jokes could be the
arbiter of what is or is not appropriate in
public.

>> Is it only me, or is that crossing some
line?

Frankly, there is no line. I hate to hurt your feelings,
but I see absolutely no difference between "Amos and
Andy" and these supposedly "well-crafted" jokes you
claim to be fond of. In fact, I would argue that "Amos
and Andy" was one of the most brilliantly
well-crafted and successful campaigns of racist propaganda
this country has ever seen. (As far as anything which
perpetuates prejudice can be considered "brilliant," of
course.) The mistaken assumption that a line exists
between what is appropriate or inappropriate for "public
consumption" or "private discussion" is yet another example,
sadly. Everyone is still entitled to their own personal
beliefs, but there is no "line" which makes it more
appropriate simply because you don't talk about it in front
of the people you're making fun of. The illusion of
a "line" only further legitimizes "secret racism,"
providing a comfy little pedestal for bigots to look down
from, while distancing themselves from the supposed
"actual racists" below.

You're free to enjoy your
well-crafted homophobic/racist/sexist jokes all you want. But
if you're so convinced that the post was racist in
the first place, you should appreciate the fact that
there's virtually no difference between you and the
person who posted, except that *they* weren't afraid to
vocalize their beliefs. Or perhaps, psychologically, this
is why you're so angry.

Whatever the case,
I've never met any of the involved parties, and all
that I can really say is that the argument has gone on
long enough on both sides.

Carey, unemployed
social theorist, who speaks only for himself, and not in
defense of anyone else on this matter.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST