Re: Distribution Query

(1) Does everyone believe that 1 toss-up in 28 on
visual arts (or perhaps what one would consider a
similarly-rationed topic, such as music or mythology) is sufficient?
I think it's a bit low, but perhaps I'm
biased.

I would say this is about right. There are
categories in NAQT which you would not see in an ACF pack.
(What is the ACF visual arts requirement for a 25/25
pack?)

By Comparison, Penn Bowl asked for 1/2 or 2/1 for a
36/36 pack. You certainly can't do much more than 1/1
if you are going to try to include many categories
and sub-categories in your round.

(2) If 1 out
of 28 is going to be the standard for these topics,
should there not at least be a way to guarantee that the
categories will appear in the first 20 toss-ups? At the
SCTs, not all moderators have Ismailic or Dinanic
speed/efficiency.

As a moderator who regularly got to 20 (but no
further) most rounds, I'd like to point out that the
players also have some control over the pace of the
round. In the D2 rounds I read, every team was taking
five seconds on every part of every bonus. All that
prompting really slowed me down.

I think NAQT keeps
its distribution private because it is a company, in
competition with others who produce quiz tournaments. I
haven't seen anyone criticize TRASH for not publishing
its distribution....

-Bill

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST