Re: A thought experiment [Re: distrib.]

<<Considering ~only~ time period, at a
tournament such as Penn Bowl or NAQT (i.e., not ACF, not
CBI), what percentage of history (including all
countries) should cover the 20th century?

And,
considering ~only~ time period, what percentage of literature
Qs should cover the 20th century?>>

I
try to break things according to the demands of the
subject. For example, if writing to my own distribution,
I'll have two american history questions. I break at
1877, the end of Reconstruction, which is where many
two-part Am. history sequences in high school and college
break and also where the major themes shift. In
European history, I break at World War I, but only if
classical history is counted separately; if not, I'd
probably go with the ACF distribution and break at the
Thirty Years War. For world history, it's hard to
quantify, since there's not a lot of interaction between,
say, the history of Nigeria and the history of Korea
until very recently. It's probably more important to
hit Asia in one question and either Africa or Latin
America in the other when writing 2 world history
questions for the same packet then it is to split
chronological hairs. 

In short, the answer is, instead
of asking how much should cover pre-1900 as opposed
to post-, I ask where the line should be placed so
that there are equal amounts on either
side.

I'm not as knowledgeable about literature, so I
usually just go with what's been done before in
subdividing that.

--M.W.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST