Re: NAQT and tiebreakers

Raj had several questions:
"Where were these
guidelines posted?"
	- They were sent by email to all SCT
hosts. The policy on tiebreakers has been the same for
at least three SCTs now, and has been discussed on
this board in the past.

The "contradiction"
between the host call web page statement and my statement
in 8549 isn't very much of a contradiction -- I had
to read the host call language twice to realize it
wasn't literally saying the same thing. My wording is
better :) because it's clearer: sectionals must have
separate play if there are four or more teams registered
in each division. There has been no host confusion
about this, to my knowledge.

The observation
that our website doesn't always keep up with all the
statements of our officers is correct. I don't have access
to changing the site, and hadn't looked to see
whether anyone had updated last year's results since my
week-old statement about Div. 2 teams being able to win
the UG (or overall) titles if they are playing in a
combined field. In general, NAQT people have been busier
with more timely things than this minor technical
addendum during the past week in particular. 

And
yes, when playing in a combined field (something we
hope becomes rarer and rarer if not extinct
altogether) is the only time that teams registering as Div. 2
teams can win the overall or undergraduate titles, as
those titles aren't offered in a Div. 2-only field.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST