Following up on Willie's post about over-long ACF
rounds, I'd like to ask what everyone thought about the
change to 21 questions a round. It seemed to me that it
just made the already-long games longer. I didn't have
any problem with the trash (whoever wrote that bonus
part about Rage rocks), but a smattering within the
20/20 round structure would have been better than the
iron law of 1/1 per round, and kept the rounds
shorter.
In the same thread, the bonuses could have used a
few more short or one-word parts (e.g. 30-20-10,
author from works, where the clues are one or two
works), and fewer multi-line parts with the pertinent
information up front.
Aside from that, the questions
were consistent, and bonus parts consistent within the
rounds. A solid editing job by Zeke, and a solid hosting
job by Yale. Thanks to both.
Dave