Re: ACF Nationals Commentary

It probably won't be a surprise to anyone that I share the sentiment 
of my teammate (and, I suspect, the entire field) concerning this 
year's tournament, which I thought was a resounding success. In order 
to avoid the appearance of another mindless panegyric and preserve 
some semblance of objectivity, it must be said that two small things 
could have been made better: 1) stats could have been posted; mine 
were such that I didn't mind too much not seeing them, but it would 
have been nice to have seen them every once in a while; 2) the option 
to prompt could have been used more often; I can think of at least 
three incidents in which a prompt might have made things more 
comfortable.

That having been said, back to the encomium: the tournament ran 
smoothly and almost seemlessly, despite the occasional buzzer 
vicissitudes that could have caused endless complications but didn't, 
not even a little; the moderating was quite good, and games seem to 
have been singularly bereft of scoring difficulties; the competition 
was diverse and excellent, giving my team the chance to play some 
teams it hadn't seen all year; and, most importantly, the questions - 
with the notable exception of one packet - were excellent, about as 
close to perfect as one can expect. The fact that they were so good 
is, I suspect, largely attributable to the editing corps and 
especially to Bhan himself in light of the indolence which teams seem 
to have displayed concerning packet submission, and while that is 
disappoing, I recognise that the tournament was the indirect 
beneficiaries of the filed's laziness. As far as I'm concerned, that, 
ladies and gentleman, was what ACF is supposed to sound like, and 
teams would do well to invest the twenty dollars and use them as 
models on which they could model future packets.

Bravo, Roger and crew; congratulations to Michigan, and thanks to all 
the teams who were such pleasant competitors. This year's nationals 
provide ample illustration for all the low-foreheads and half-wits 
who demand a dichotomy that a tournament can be both hardcore and 
great fun, as this one certainly was.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST